Tens of millions of children today are forced by law to spend precious hours of their lives grinding away at material whose future utility is highly questionable. Should they spend as much time as they do learning French, or Spanish, or German? Are the hours spent on English maximally useful? Should all children be required to study algebra? Might they not benefit more from studying probability? Logic? Computer programming? Philosophy? Aesthetics? Mass communications?
Anyone who thinks the present curriculum makes sense is invited to explain to an intelligent fourteen-year-old why algebra or French or any other subject is essential for him. Adult answers are almost always evasive. The reason is simple: the present curriculum is a mindless holdover from the past.
Why, for example, must teaching be organized around such fixed disciplines as English, economics, mathematics, or biology? Why not around stages of the human life cycle: a course on birth, childhood, adolescence, marriage, career, retirement, death? Or around contemporary social problems? Or around significant technologies of the past and future? Or around countless other imaginable alternatives?
Alvin Toffler, Future Shock (1970)
| Welcome to RAUSER BEGINS, the official online home of Richard J. Rauser ("Rick" to most folks), professional high school teacher, madly-in-love husband, and ridiculously doting parent. I can be easily contacted at rauserbegins@gmail.com.
This site contains the following elements:
(my list of upcoming homework, tests, and assignments)
(my philosophy of education blog)
(my teaching portfolio)
(my life in progress)
(my professional qualifications)
|



