<Cesar>One could argue that open architecture, in the frame of religion can be achieved via meditation. Having trust or good faith helps one evolve in this free space, while knowing that this nothingness isn’t sterile or necessarily hostile.

It is almost impossible to distinguish a perfect open architecture from a perfectly closed architecture : you can’t enter in neither of them. You cannot penetrate in the close architecture because it has no opening and you cant enter an absolute open architecture because it has no boundaries. Both perfectly open and close are too pure to tolerate human presence, the human body – the human active conscience. Therefore, the only open architecture we could enjoy is an impure, unfinished approximation of an absolute open architecture.
To move on, we need to leave our faith aside but keep the confidence it produces.
The open architecture we are looking for is not describable in here, it has to be
more practical.</Cesar>
<Andrew>I think obliquity that people are talking about... if you want something
you need to sort of go around. If you are looking too hard for something in one
place, you forget to see where it actually might be.</Andrew>