| Functional requirements | Design parameters | Analysis | References | Risks | Countermeasures |
Educational
| New input, new responsibilities,design is focus |
| Read 2.07 discussion, 2.0007 course notes | Too much new, to much close to other IMTEK courses | Keep design methodology in the foreground |
| Managable | Number of staff, activity plan, Exact | 5 students per team |
| Too much work, Requires too many staff to manage | Plan well. Estimate time. Try to reach 1 person work load! |
| MST relevant | MST solution, manufacturing at RSC | ICP, SU8, PDMS, ... | RSC processes, low cost mems | MST is broad and complex | Fix technology to a few steps. Clear feasibility before semester starts |
| Team-oriented | Small teams with clear roles | Individual and team work |
| One person does all, Lazy ones pass anyway | Students get roles. Marks split between role mark and team mark |
| Problem solving focus | No pet solution, hands-on experience | Prototype items, reverse engineering |
| Students wait for solution, Avoid thinking | Reiterate idea regularly. Use weekly meetings |
| Interdisciplinary | No reliance on only one technical discipline | Start with mechanics (kinematics) thenn add fluidics, optics, etc. |
| Focus is on one area, losing interest of group | Select fields well |
| Part of a larger whole | Each semester contributes to a larger whole |
|
| Becomes too complex, Continuity difficult | Plan well. Plan both courses together as a 26 week event. |
| Learn entire design cycle, from idea to realization | Phases include planning, designing, making |
|
| Course not completed. | Give milestones, milepebbles, deliverables |
| Inspirational | Dynamic rhythm, fun topics, passionate |
|
| Losing momentum, Lack of attendance | Keep topics fresh, short, focused, with discussion time
|