Identify (1-2 Marks)
Asks candidates to recognize one or more component parts or processes. 

Compare / Contrast (4 Marks)
Asks candidates to describe two situations and resent the and contrast similarities and differences between them. On its own, a description of the two situations does not meet the requirements of this key word

Describe (4 Marks)
Asks candidates to give a portrayal of a given situation. It is a neutral request to present a detailed picture of a given situation, event, pattern, process or outcome, although it may be followed by a further opportunity for discussion and analysis.

Distinguish (4 Marks)
Asks candidates to demonstrate a clear understanding of similar terms.

Examine (4 Marks)
Asks candidates to investigate an argument or concept and present their own analysis. Candidates should approach the question in a critical and detailed way which uncovers the assumptions and interrelationships of the issue.

Explain (4 Marks)
Asks candidates to describe clearly, make intelligible and give reasons for a concept, process, relationship or development.

Analyze (10 Marks)
Asks candidates to respond with a closely argued and detailed examination of the perspective or a development. A clearly written analysis will indicate the relevant interrelationships between key variables, any relevant assumptions involved and also include a critical view of the significance of the account as presented. If this key is augmented by "the extent to which" then the candidate should be clear that judgment is also sought.

Discuss / Consider (10 Marks)
Asks candidates to consider a statement or to offer a considered review or balanced discussion of a particular topic. If the question is presented in the form of a quotation, the specific purpose is to stimulate a discussion on each of its parts. The question is asking for the candidate's opinions; these should be presented clearly and supported with as much empirical evidence and sound argument as possible.

Evaluate (10 Marks)
Asks candidates to make an appraisal of the argument or concept under investigation of discussion. Candidates should weigh the nature of the evidence available, and identify and discuss the convincing aspects of the argument, as well as its limitations.

To What Extent? (10 Marks)
Asks candidates to evaluate the success or otherwise of one argument or concept over another. Candidates should present a conclusion, supported by argument

 

ITGS Question Paper Format

Paper 1

(a) Identify / define
Entry question based on the underpinning technology identified in the scenario. [2 marks]

(b) Describe
Factual, technical based/application of the technology. Related in principle to the scenario without necessarily using it explicitly. [4 marks]

(c) Explain / examine / distinguish
Requires the use of the scenario. Social aspects will usually be emphasized. Technical knowledge may be examined. [4 marks]

 

Paper 2

(a) Identify / define
Entry question based on the underpinning technology identified in the scenario. [2 marks]

(b) Describe
Factual, technical based/application of the technology. Related in principle to the scenario without necessarily using it explicitly. [4 marks]

(c) Explain / examine / compare
Requires the use of the scenario. Social aspects will usually be emphasized. Technical knowledge may be examined. [4 marks]

(d) Discuss / evaluate / to what extent / analyse
Wider ranging considerations in the scenario that emphasize the social effects. [10 marks]