Jill Starr, an avid Russian Orthodox Christian Teaches 101 Constitutional Law to Republican Presidential Hopeful, Michele Bachman.

Wherefore “Gay Rights” Are Human Rights and Wherefore Her Duty To America As A Future American President Includes Differentiating Between Her Personal Theological Views and Upholding Civic / Political Rights for Gays As American Citizens Via United States Constitutional Law.

By Jill Starr 

In seemingly unending arguments for or against gay marriage in America, we hear continual reverberations of identical redundant and outdated arguments emanating from mouths of our politicians merely towing their party lines; creative thinking doesn’t seem to be involved. A student of United States Constitutional Law, I strongly believe their rhetoric is not what America’s founding fathers’ envisaged.

Saturday, May 16, 2009

#GAY RIGHTS ARE CIVIL RIGHTS (!) END OF SUBJECT OBAMA (!)

In seemingly unending arguments for or against gay marriage in America, we
hear continual reverberations of identical redundant and outdated arguments emanating from mouths of our politicians merely towing their party lines; creative thinking doesn’t seem to be involved. A student of United States Constitutional Law, I strongly believe their rhetoric is not what America’s founding fathers’ envisaged.

Instead of old redundant Democratic or Republican justifications for or against
legalizing gay marriage in America, I’d like to hear some brave political soul running for public office say something like this for
once; it is legally correct.

1) Although I personally don’t believe in gay marriage owing to my personal and/or religious convictions, I am a publically elected official. And as such, I owe it
to my constituents to protect their legal political and civic entitlements/rights all American citizens share. This includes both their civil/political and social/economic rights as stated in the full faith and credit clause of US law.

2) Homosexuals are entitled to gay marriage although I personally disagree with the idea because denying them their right thereto is not comparable to denying any one
sector of American society say the right to work based on their personal private sexual preferences. If heterosexuals are entitled to
unemployment, so are gays. To deny any particular political/civic right to any American citizen based on sexual preference, religion, race and/or creed is unconstitutional; plain and simple.

When Republicans gain the moral courage and political willpower to objectively produce such a speech, they’ll be many times more powerful a political party in America capable of gaining support from the homosexual citizen base in America.
Posted by lpcyusa at 6:30 PM 0 comments

http://sites.google.com/site/jillstarrsite/

http://picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa/