|
"President
Clinton and his national security team ignored several opportunities to
capture Osama bin Laden and his terrorist associates, including one as
late as last year" -Mansoor Ijaz, L.A. Times, December 5, 2001
Audio: Smoking Gun
Time Magazine recently
printed a story about Clinton handing the incoming Bush Administration a
plan, but quickly that myth was dispersed. Bush Administration
officials denied ever getting any plan only leaving us to conclude that
Time Magazine was being spoon fed by Clinton toadies. They turned a
quick power point presentation with one section whereby Clarke made a
few suggestion into some elaborate plan and blueprint for going after Al
Qaeda. It was a 3 to 5 year roll back.
Clinton did help the
incoming Bush Administration by denying them transition funds and
forcing them to set up an office in Virginia and run off of donations.
Addtionally he looted and then vandalized the White House. Bush has a
plan crafted to eliminate Al Qaeda and did approve it only days before
9-11 and it unfortunately was too late.
Above is the Smoking Gun. An
audio of Bill Clinton admitting clearly that he rejected his own
Administration's preparation for an attack in 1999 or 2000. He offers
the typical Clintonesque excuses saying it simply wouldn't work.
Audio: Clinton Tales
AIM Report #18 - Clinton Tales of Getting Bin Laden
In
recent commentaries we talked about how the Clinton administration had
actually helped support Osama bin Ladens al-Qaeda terrorist
organization. This was done partly through support of the Kosovo
Liberation Army, the KLA, in its war against Serbia. The core of the KLA
were radical Muslim Marxists who trafficked in heroin, and were linked
to bin Laden. It was also done, arguably, as a geopolitical
consideration, believing that the Taliban government of Afghanistan
served American interests as a check on Iran.
Clintons
actions as president have come under close scrutiny as journalists and
politicians have begun to analyze how the U.S. was so vulnerable to the
September eleventh attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
Recent articles by the Associated Press and the Philadelphia Inquirer
have charged that the Clinton administration had opportunities to
eliminate bin Laden, but failed to do so. The Inquirer article reported
that the U.S. had for years both "the knowledge and capability to
kill...bin Laden." It said that American special forces and CIA
operatives had been in Afghanistan, but were prohibited by the White
House from going after him.
Bin
Ladens terrorist organization had been linked to the 1993 World Trade
Center bombing, and to the 1998 bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya
and Tanzania, for which he was indicted by the U.S. government. Clinton
signed a policy directive authorizing the CIA to prepare a plan to get
him. We attacked one of his camps in Afghanistan with cruise missiles
and reportedly killing some of his supporters. Our missiles also
destroyed an aspirin plant in Sudan owned by a Saudi businessman. It was
targeted because it was believed to be a chemical-weapons plant owned
by bin Laden.
The
AP has reported that last December the Pentagon told President Clinton
that they knew the location of bin Laden and could take him out. But
Clinton decided it was too risky, and refused to authorize such an
action. Clinton was asked by Fox News if this was true. He said it was
not true and that his best shot was when he bombed bin Ladens training
camp in 98. Several days later he told the London Times he had
authorized bin Ladens capture or assassination two years ago, but the
intelligence information needed to carry it out was never available.
Representative
Dana Rohrabacher, a Republican from California, charged in a speech on
the House floor on September 17, that the Clinton administration had
secretly informed Pakistan and Saudi Arabia that it would not try to
overthrow the Taliban. He had tried in vain to persuade the Clinton
administration that this was a mistake and that the U.S. should be
supporting the Northern Alliance, which has succeeded in keeping the
Taliban from taking over all of Afghanistan.
Rohrabacher,
an authority on Afghanistan, also said that he was going to see White
House officials on September 11 to warn them that the Talibans
assassination of Commander Massoud, the leader of the Northern Alliance,
meant that bin Laden was going to do something so terrible that
retaliation would be required. He was right, but his warning was too
late.
Click above on the audio link to listen to all of the commentary. 
Under Clinton, we suffered 6 major attacks that were orchestrated by Bin Laden.
After the 1993
World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured 1,000;
President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down
and punished.
Bill Clinton warned
America in his radio address that we should not overreact to the 1993
WTC bombing. "I would discourage the American people from overreacting
to this," Clinton said.
Bill Clinton treated it as a petty criminal offense even though Bush 41 told him terrorists had declared war on America.
CIA
director Woolsey now reveals that he never had a private personal
meeting with Clinton during the first two years of his tenure as head of
the CIA - exactly the key period in investigating the 1993 attack.
Bill Clinton did not visit the WTC towers.
Bill Clinton did not even make a public appearance on national television.
Bill Clinton tried to stop a reward fund for the capture of terrorists involved in the attack.
From the time
President Clinton took office until May of 1995, a Presidential Decision
Directive, PDD 39, sat in the National Security Council, in the In Box
of one of the officials with no action taken. The significance of PDD 39
is that it was the document defining what the missions and roles were
of combating terrorism.
Despite what
happened at the World Trade Center in 1993, the Clinton administration
did not finally act on [PDD 39] until after the attack in Oklahoma City.
The only reason for
that is because in the two weeks prior to Oklahoma City, the front page
of both Newsweek and Time Magazine carried the question: 'Is President
Clinton Relevant?'
After the 1993 ambush in Somalia, which killed 19 and injured 84; President Clinton just tucked tail and ran away.
On May 4, 1993, Clinton having taken office in January, U.S. Marine
Lt. Gen. Robert Johnston handed over control of the relief mission to
the UN. "It's all yours," he told the new UN commander, a Turkish
general, as he departed with most of his U.S. troops in tow.
Bill Clinton sent
U.S. Army Rangers on a highly risky mission to take out Aidid. Aidid
militia were not Somali but members of bin Laden's Al Qaeda network, who
were deployed in his Mogadishu bases.
Bill Clinton denied the Pentagon a request for armor support.
After botching the whole mission, Clinton pulled out and Bin Laden took notice of that.
Bill Clinton even gave the target of the mission, Aidid, a marine guard after the botched mission to capture him.
After
the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military
personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down
and punished.
After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in
Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel;
Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and
punished.
Bill Clinton cared
so little that his own assistant secretary of state, Dick Holbrooke, had
trouble getting him to pay attention to warnings about the impending
attack on the Khobar Towers.
After the Khobar
Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia in 1996, Clinton had Dick Morris take a
poll. "We tested 'peacemaker' or 'toughness,'" York quotes Morris as
recalling. The public preferred toughness. "So Clinton talked tough."
But the FBI director, Louis Freeh, became so exasperated by Clinton's
failure to raise the matter with Saudi officials that he actually asked
former President George Bush to do so instead.
After
the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and
injured 5,000; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted
down and punished.
Clinton used American tax dollars to pay for the trucks used in the embassy bombings. (See Below)
The
U.S. State Department thwarted an investigation into two suspects in
the Aug. 7. 1998, bombing of the U.S. embassies in Dar es Salaam,
Tanzania and Nairobi, Kenya, which had killed more than 250 people,
including 12 Americans, according to reports from MSNBC news filed on
July 29.
Clinton was more concerned with obstructing justice than doing anything about such a grave terrorist attack.
After
the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S.
sailors; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down
and punished.
Shortly after the bombing of the Cole, Clinton had an opportunity to take Bin Laden out and refused to. (See Below)
A
Pentagon intelligence expert on terrorism in the Persian Gulf has told
Congress that he warned of possible terrorist attacks on U.S. forces.
Maybe
if Clinton had kept his promise and got Bin Laden, 3,000 people in New
York, Washington, D.C., and the Heros of Flight 93 that are now dead
would be alive today and we wouldn't have lost 290 people along with
more than 6,323 people that had been injured on his watch.
Under Clinton, at least three opportunities to have Bin Laden handed over to the U.S. were rejected inexplicably.
According
to the Sunday Times of London, Clinton himself said his refusal to
accept the offer to hand over Bin Laden was the "Biggest Mistake" of his
presidency.
According to anonymous sources in the CIA, Clinton did not want Bin Laden arrested.
The intelligence officials, both of whom were involved in secret
negotiations between Washington and Khartoum to take bin Laden into
custody, offered the damning accounts to New York's Village Voice.
A
U.S. intelligence official, speaking on condition of anonymity, this
week called the Clinton administration's decision to pass up a chance to
arrest Osama bin Laden in 1996 a "disgrace," saying "somebody didn't
want this to happen."
A
second intelligence official, also speaking anonymously, corroborated
the charge that there was a deliberate effort to let bin Laden escape
from the Sudan to Afghanistan, saying "somebody let this slip up."
The
second official lamented that the U.S. lost a treasure trove of
intelligence on the elusive al-Qaeda chief when it let him slip away.
"It was not a matter of arresting bin Laden but of access to
information," he told the Voice.
The first instance they cite
was Sudans offer to extradite bin Laden in 1996. The Clinton
administration turned them down, saying there wasnt enough evidence to
convict him in an American court. Originally this was denied by
administration officials, but according to the Times, senior sources
from within the administration now confirm it was true. In the January
issue of Vanity Fair magazine, former ambassador to Sudan, Timothy
Carney, confirmed it, saying it had serious implications regarding the
U.S. embassy bombings in 1998, and that "the U.S. lost access to a mine
of material on bin Laden and his organization."
The second offer the Times
article details involved Mansoor Ijaz, a Pakistani-American who
contributed to Clintons presidential campaign and served as a go-between
for the administration and various powers in the Middle East. Ijaz
presented an exchange of e-mails as evidence to prove that he had in
fact met with Clinton officials and intelligence officers from the
United Arab Emirates, who were offering to help to deliver bin Laden to
the U.S. Ijaz says the deal was blown when Clinton sent his top
counterterrorism adviser to meet the Arab leaders directly rather than
continue to go through back channels.
The third offer, described
as mysterious, was said to come from Saudi Arabian intelligence
agencies. It was said to involve putting a tracking device in the
luggage of bin Ladens mother during a visit to her son in Afghanistan,
but it too was turned down. Richard Shelby, the highest ranking
Republican on the Senate Intelligence committee, said he was aware of a
Saudi offer to help, but was not able to talk about the specifics.
Under Clinton, there were several opportunities to take out Bin Laden, but her refused to authorize them.
Shortly after
September 11th, articles by the AP and the Philadelphia Inquirer charged
that the Clinton administration had chances to take out bin Laden, but
refused to authorize it.
In the waning days
of the Clinton presidency, senior officials received specific
intelligence about the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden and weighed a
military plan to strike the suspected terrorist mastermind's location.
The administration ultimately opted against an attack.
The information
spurred a high-level debate inside the White House in December 2000
about whether the classified information provided the last best chance
for President Clinton to punish bin Laden before he left office, the
officials said.
"There were a
couple of points, including in December, where there was intelligence
indicative of bin Laden's whereabouts. But I can categorically tell you
that at no point was it ripe enough to act," former National Security
Adviser Sandy Berger told The Associated Press.
In May 1996, the
Sudanese capitulated to U.S. pressure and asked Bin Laden to leave,
despite their feeling that he could be monitored better in Sudan than
elsewhere.
Another golden
opportunity to eliminate Bin Laden was after he had been expelled from
Sudan. He flew in a plane to Afghanistan and his plane could have easily
been taken out.
Former Yugoslav
President Slobodan Milosevic told the U.N. tribunal Tuesday that Osama
bin Laden was in Albania in 2000 and that the Clinton Administration had
discussed it with him.
 And
still, Clinton lies and says his 1998 'Wag the Dog' move firing cruise
misiles at an aspirin factory and 14 dollar tents, was the "best chance"
we had to get Bin Laden.
On Aug. 20, 1998, three
days after half-confessing to lying about Monica Lewinsky and the day
she testified before a federal grand jury, former President Clinton
declared bin Laden the world's most dangerous terrorist.
Bill Clinton has made a
series of public statements claiming his administration came close to
killing bin Laden during a cruise-missile raid in 1998.
Touring the rubble of lower
Manhattan on September 13, Clinton said, "The best shot we had at him
was when I bombed his training camps in 1998. We just missed him by a
matter of hours, maybe even less than an hour."
A few days later, on NBC,
Clinton said, "We had quite good intelligence that he and his top
lieutenants would be in his training camp. So I ordered the
cruise-missile attacks, and we didn't tell anybody, including the
Pakistanis, whose airspace we had to travel over, until the last minute.
And unfortunately we missed them, apparently not by very long....We
never had another chance where the intelligence was as reliable to
justify military action."
But one of Clinton's top
military commanders, who was deeply involved in the Afghanistan
operation, has a different recollection. In an interview with National
Review Online, retired general Anthony Zinni, commander of U.S. forces
in the region at the time, described the 1998 cruise-missile raid as a
"million-to-one-shot."
"There was a possibility
[bin Laden] could have been there," Zinni recalls. "My intelligence
people did not put a lot of faith in that....As I was given this mission
to do, I did not see that anyone had any degree of assurance or
reliability that that was going to happen."
George W. Bush has made it clear he sees the action as a model of how not
to strike back at terrorism. "When I take action, I'm not going to fire
a $2 million missile at a $10 empty tent and hit a camel in the butt,"
Bush reportedly told a group of senators. "It's going to be decisive."
Refer
to above for even more damaging facts that Clinton was offered Bin
Laden on a platter silver platter at least three times and had several
opportunities to take out Bin Laden and refused to do so.
Also,
Clinton ordered the military to pump as many as 20 Tomahawk missiles
into what he said was a chemical-weapons plant in Sudan financed by bin
Laden. It turned out to be a pill plant owned by a Saudi businessman to
whom the administration later had to pay $1 million in interest for
seizing his plant.
Intelligence
officials at the time expressed reservations about including the plant
on the target list. Clinton picked the target himself.
"Clinton
knew it wouldn't work in Afghanistan. It was a public-affairs move,"
the Pentagon official said, arguing that bombing is an extremely
unreliable way to destroy a terrorist cell or assassinate its leader.
"If he hit him [bin Laden], he would have been lucky."
The mission, which used some 80 missiles at a price of about $750,000 apiece.
Under Clinton, we found that he supported Bin Laden and his network.
Bill
Clinton's IRS pursued his personal enemies with great enthusiasm -
auditing Billy Dale, Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick
and dozens more - America's enemies, it seems, got a free pass from the
same agency.
At least 16 U.S.-based non-profit entities have been linked financially to bin Laden.
The Islamic African Relief Agency (IARA), has been directly linked to earlier attacks on U.S. interests by bin Laden.
IARA
reportedly transferred money to Mercy International, another non-profit
Muslim organization that purchased vehicles used by Osama bin Laden to
bomb the U.S. embassies in both Kenya and Tanzania on August 8, 1998.
The Clinton State Department showered the IARA with $4.2 million in grants.
The
Clinton administration shut down a 1995 investigation of Islamic
charities, concerned that a public probe would expose Saudi Arabia's
suspected ties to a global money-laundering operation that raised
millions for anti-Israel terrorists, federal officials told The
Washington Times.
Bill
Clinton's abuse of the military that included bombing Yugoslavia to
distract from the scandals, China-gate and the rape of Juanita
Broaddrick, strengthened Bin Ladens terrorist movement and its position
in the Balkans and actually involved the U.S. allying itself with Bin
Laden's KLA, which is a faction of Al Qaeda.
A
story by Jerry Seper in the Washington Times on May 4, 1999, reported,
"Some members of the Kosovo Liberation Army, which has financed its war
effort through the sale of heroin, were trained in terrorist camps run
by international fugitive Osama bin Ladenwho is wanted in the 1998
bombing of two U.S. embassies in Africa that killed 224 persons,
including 12 Americans."
Seper
said that newly obtained intelligence reports showed that the KLA had
enlisted Islamic terrorists in its conflict with Serbia and that bin
Laden's organization, known as al-Qaeda, had both trained and
financially supported the KLA, which had been labeled a terrorist group
by a Clinton State Department official.
President
Clinton incubated the Taliban regime in Afghanistan for at least three
years, despite the fact that it was harboring Osama bin Laden, was
responsible for growing 60 percent of the world's heroin and denied
basic human rights to the nation.
Rep.
Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., says he was belittled, stonewalled and
ridiculed for three years for asserting the congressional oversight role
in the formulation of foreign policy toward Afghanistan during the last
term of the Clinton administration.
Using
his seat on the House International Affairs Committee, Rohrabacher
attempted, he says, for several years to secure communiqués, cables and
other State Department documents that would reveal what was behind U.S.
policy toward Kabul. He says he and his committee were "stonewalled" and
"belittled" in all their attempts.
According
to Rohrabacher, the Clinton administration played a role in creating
the Taliban by giving a 'green light' to Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and
other gulf states to fund, direct, and organize the Taliban.
Rohrabacher
said at one point on the house floor in a Sept. 17th [1999] speech that
the Clinton administration promised Pakistan and Saudi Arabia that it
wouldnt overthrow the Taliban according to the UPI.
Robin
Raphel, Clinton's assistant secretary of state for south Asia affairs
until mid-1997, is believed to be instrumental in the rise of the
Taliban.
One
report suggested that several Islamic states expressed the belief that
Raphel and other U.S. officials along with Afghans in the U.S. were on
the payroll of Unocal's payroll. They cite that she provided a fiery
defense of Unocal and especially the Taliban in negotiations with the
Afghanistan government.
During such an encounter, Raphel's words -- in effect asking the government to 'give it up."
Read more about Clinton being Pro-Taliban here.
A
secret deal between the Clinton administration and terrorists linked
with Osama bin Laden led directly to the senseless slaughter of some 70
West European tourists and the wounding of hundreds, according to a book
written by a former congressional terrorism expert.
According to Yossef Bodansky, author of "Bin Laden: The Man Who Declared War on America,"
a Central Intelligence Agency operative dealing with Islamic terrorists
on matters of security for the U.S. forces in Bosnia-Herzegovina led
them to believe President Clinton would look the other way at attempts
to overthrow Egypt's Hosni Mubarak.
"If
senior Islamicist terrorist leaders are to be believed, the Clinton
administration was willing to tolerate the overthrow of the Mubarak
government in Egypt and the establishment of an Islamist state in its
stead as an acceptable price for reducing the terrorist threat to U.S.
forces in Bosnia-Herzegovina," states the 1999 book, which has been
rushed into a new printing.
The
tradeoff was reportedly raised in discussions between Egyptian
terrorist leader Ayman al-Zawahiri Osama bin Laden's right-hand man and
an Arab-American, Abu-Umar al-Amriki, known as a CIA emissary.
In
that attack, terrorists wielding machine guns and knives massacred
nearly 70 tourists, most of them Swiss. For about 45 minutes, the
attackers mowed down unarmed, unsuspecting tourists in an attempt to
show the world that visitors were not safe in Mubarak's Egypt.
In
addition to leading to the attack on the tourists, Bodansky writes, the
secret deal between the Clinton administration and the bin Laden
terrorist cell drove Mubarak into de facto cooperation with the Islamist
terror-sponsoring states against the United States. Shortly afterwards,
early in 1998, Egypt withheld support for the use of force by the U.S.
against Iraq.
The
Clinton-Reno Justice Department refused to allow two veteran FBI agents
assigned to the anti-terrorist probe to investigate a key figure tied
to Osama bin Laden.
According
to ABC News correspondent Brian Ross today, the two agents told him
they were ordered to stop investigations into a suspected terror cell
linked to Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network and the Sept. 11 attacks.
FBI
special agents Robert Wright and John Vincent told Ross they were
called off criminal investigations of suspected terrorists linked to the
deadly bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa. U.S. officials say
al-Qaeda was responsible for the embassy attacks and the Sept. 11, 2001,
attacks in the United States.
"September
the 11th is a direct result of the incompetence of the FBI's
International Terrorism Unit. No doubt about that. Absolutely no doubt
about that," Wright said. "You can't know the things I know and not go
public."
Noting
that, with growing terrorism in the Middle East in the mid-1990s,
Wright and Vincent, then based in Chicago, were assigned to track a
connection to a suspected terrorist cell that would later lead them to a
link with Osama bin Laden. Wright told Ross that when he pressed for
authorization to open a criminal investigation into the money trail, his
supervisor stopped him.
Represented
by Judicial Watch and former lead House impeachment counsel David
Schippers, agents Wright and Vincent have filed suit against the Justice
Department over the episode.
Under Clinton, Warnings about terrorist attacks were ignored.
CIA
Director George Tenet refused on Wednesday to permit the House-Senate
Select Committee probe into the 9/11 attacks to release information
about intelligence briefings to the White House on terrorist activities,
including whether the president was briefed on plots to use hijacked
airliners as weapons.
Tenet's
directive would cover whatever President Clinton was told about a 1998
plan to load an airliner with explosives and crash it into the World
Trade Center.
"The
director of central intelligence has declined to declassify two issues
of particular importance to this inquiry," Eleanor Hill, staff director
for the committee, told the panel.
"References
to the intelligence community providing information to the president or
White House" would remain classified, Hill testified during Wednesday's
open hearing.
"According
to [Tenet], the president's knowledge of intelligence information
relevant to this inquiry remains classified even when the substance of
intelligence information has been declassified," she explained.
The
identity of and information on a key al-Qaeda leader involved in the
Sept. 11 attacks would also stay classified, the committee director
said.
The
classified information would include news of whether then-President
Clinton was tipped off about the 1998 plot involving what Hill said was a
"group of unidentified Arabs [who] planned to fly an explosive-laden
plane from a foreign country into the World Trade Center."
The
hijacking tip was given to the Federal Aviation Administration and FBI.
Neither agency acted on it. The mysterious Arab group may now be linked
to bin Laden, Hill said.
The
1998 terrorist plot to use airliners as flying bombs was one of 12
similar plans outlined by Hill that were uncovered by investigators from
1994 through 2001. Sources:
- The Heritage Foundation, "AFTER WORLD TRADE CENTER BOMBING, U.S. NEEDS STRONGER ANTI-TERRORISM POLICY," available here.
- The Jewish World Review, "Clinton's priority: Political correctness over fighting terror," available here.
- The Jewish World
Review, "Clinton's failure to mobilize America to confront foreign
terror after the 1993 attack led directly to 9-11 disaster," available here.
- Newsmax, "Clinton Paid 'Lip Service' to Terror Attacks, Expert Charges," available here.
- Human Events, "Gore's 'Ill-Considered' Somalia Story," available here.
- Townhall.com, "Clinton's legacy," available here.
-
Accuracy In Media, "Catastrophic Intelligence Failure," available here.
-
Newsmax, "Morris: Clinton Was Oblivious to Khobar Towers Terror Alert," available here.
-
Judicial Watch, "Why Was Clinton Soft on Terrorism?," available here.
-
MSNBC, "US State Dept. blocked FBI-Sudan cooperation on embassy bombings," available here.
-
Insight Magazine, "Clinton Connection Causes Quandary," available here.
-
The Associated Press, "Analyst: terrorism warning ignored," available here.
-
The Washington Post, "Intelligence Failure? Let's Go Back to Sudan," available here.
-
Accuracy In Media, "CLINTON'S "BIGGEST MISTAKE,"' available here.
-
The Associated Press, "Clinton rejected military strike on bin Laden" available here.
-
The National Review, "Another Clinton Tale? Did he really come close to taking out Osama Bin Laden?," available here.
-
The Washington Times, "Clinton White House axed terror-fund probe," available here.
-
World
Net Daily, "Was Clinton pro-Taliban? Congressman charges Afghan
extremists were coddled, oversight efforts 'belittled,'" available here.
-
World
Net Daily, "Did Clinton nod to Mubarak overthrow? Book suggests foreign
policy goof led to Luxor terror massacre," available here.
-
Newsmax, "CIA Sources: Clinton Administration 'didn't want' Bin Laden Arrested," available here.
-
World
Net Daily, "Pentagon suspects Osama bin Laden - Officials anxious to
take terrorist out, after Clinton let him 'grow in strength,'" available
here.
-
L.A. Times, "Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize," available here.
-
Newsmax, "Clinton Paid 'Lip Service' to Terror Attacks, Expert Charges," available here.
-
U.K. Guardian, "Milosevic: Bin Laden was in Albania," available here.
-
Newsmax, "Agents: Clinton-Reno DOJ Nixed FBI Terrorist Probe," available here.
-
Newsmax, "Clinton Briefing on '98 WTC Hijack Plot to Stay Secret," available here.
|
