Page 1 Continued on Page 2
In 1949, Nikola Tesla, a scientist of the likes of Albert Einstein invented many things to do with electricity, including the
AC (alternating current) that we all use in our homes today. He also invented a method of extracting electricity from the atmosphere.
This invention has been kept quiet by the authorities, in order to promote their profits on oil. But now, more people every day are learning about it, and the suppression must soon cease.
Tesla, and his protégé Otis T. Carr envisioned that private transport would be flying machines which take their energy from the air through which they fly. The same power unit could be used to power houses and offices, even factories, without using ANY fossil fuel, or creating any pollution. Tesla's idea has been developed by several small inventors, and there are now some machines ready for production, when sufficient investment is available. That's if the inventors aren't murdered, like Tesla, and many of his followers.
In addition, there are several people who have succeeded in running their car on water, so I have included a couple of videos on the water-powered cars. This site includes several videos explaining free energy, and other related information. The site is under constant development as further information comes available. OVERUNITY - FREE ENERGY EXISTS! -------------------------------------------
----- A free energy machine does exist. And many other helpful advanced technologies. An uplifting video.
(World Improvement Through The Spirit Ministries) ====================================================================
Intelligent design -amazing video inside a cell of how human parts are manufactured - blows Darwinian theory away completely
---------------------=======================================================---------------------------------
PESWiki is guided by the New Energy Congress, a network of 50+ energy professionals who are dedicated to clean energy technology advancement. Both the NEC and Pure Energy Systems (PES) Network were founded by Sterling D. Allan,
CEO. Many others knowledgeable in the industry also help make this site
what it is -- a movement for identifying and promoting the best clean
energy technologies.
New Stories nearly every day
NewsFrom PESWikiJump to: navigation, search
Sunday, April 26, 2009
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Friday, April 24, 2009
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Wednesday, April 22, 2009 -- Earth Day
Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Continuation of News from April, 2009 >>MORE-----------------------
“Most
of the problems that we face in our world today, whether they be spiritual and
religious or scientific, political and economic, are all because people are holding
onto some perspective that has nothing to do with the truth but has to do with
their own belief system and addiction to something that is outdated, and they
can’t let go of it.”[4]
Sitting
American presidents are out of the loop regarding the ET/UFO situation.
Clinton read Greer’s briefing materials at the White House and exclaimed: “I know
this is all true, but God damn it, they won’t tell me a thing. Not a God
damned thing!”[9] Jimmy Carter tried getting UFO information
from George Bush the First, who was then the CIA’s Director. Bush refused
to give Carter the CIA's information, and told Carter to get it from someplace
else. Carter persisted, and was eventually threatened with an abrupt end
to his presidency if he did not immediately cease his investigative efforts.[10] JFK was also stonewalled as he tried
investigating the ET/UFO situation. Dwight Eisenhower was the last sitting
president in the loop.[11] During Greer’s
journey, he was given a classified CIA report on the wiretap they had on Marilyn
Monroe’s phone. Monroe told a friend that JFK had seen recovered ET craft,
and Monroe was going to call a press conference to publicly disclose it.
Monroe “committed suicide” the next day.[12]
An FBI agent told Greer that he could be locked up almost indefinitely for publishing
that Monroe document, but Greer does so to this day. People such as Laurence
Rockefeller, Barry Goldwater and even secretary generals of the United Nations
have tried making the ET/UFO issue a public matter, but were thwarted.[13]
---------------------------------------------
Impacts of Establishing a Breakthrough New Energy Economy Brian O’Leary and Wade Frazier, www.brianoleary.info and www.ahealedplanet.net, June 1, 2009, in reply to the U.S. DoE/DARPA-E New Energy Grant solicitation, control number 25A5231
“The world is at a crossroads. We can no longer afford to ignore the human impact of climate change. This is a call to the negotiators to come to the most ambitious agreement ever negotiated or to continue to accept mass starvation, mass sickness and mass migration on an ever growing scale.” --Kofi Annan, former Secretary General of the United Nations, Global Humanitarian Forum, May 29, 2009 “From now on, America’s top priority in the energy field must be to explore all potential components of this new energy future and move swiftly to develop those with the greatest promise.” --Prof. Michael T. Klare, Foreign Policy in Focus, June 28, 2008 “The resistance to a new idea increases as the square of its importance.” --Bertrand Russell Abstract There is evidence that breakthrough clean energy proofs-of-concepts could lead to a new energy economy that would provide a sustainable future for all of humanity and nature. Because this possibility has been ignored by mainstream science, due to limiting scientific assumptions, and suppressed by an energy industry vested in unsustainable practices, it has been difficult for the public to recognize the enormous potential of new energy sources or to understand how they could be researched, developed, and implemented in practical ways. We propose assembling an advisory group to the DoE to make recommendations about R&D programs and to suggest a realistic transition to a new energy economy. We also propose polling the public about their attitudes toward a future of breakthrough clean energy. This overall effort, including the activities of the advisory group, would be largely voluntary—in harmony with the nature of “free” energy. Introduction Over the past century, the world has witnessed hundreds of demonstrations of a variety of breakthrough clean energy concepts, whether it be energy from the vacuum (“zero-point”), cold fusion, or special hydrogen and water chemistries in the presence of catalysts. Any one of these concepts, if properly developed, promises a world of clean energy abundance. Yet mainstream scientists, corporations, governments and media have ignored and suppressed these proofs-of-concepts before they’ve been put to practical use. Most decision-makers and public spokespeople deny the very possibility that a breakthrough clean, cheap and decentralized energy culture could ever evolve, because this would appear to violate existing scientific principles. But we have witnessed many demonstrations of the viability of these possibilities. We believe that many of these concepts are viable if the required R&D and deployment were carried out under public sponsorship. If responsibly managed, the adoption of these concepts could lead civilization to a culture of abundance.
If we continue on the path of conventional energy sources, we face a dismal future with carbon and air pollution, Peak Oil and the dangers of nuclear power. Our analysis shows that no energy alternative from traditional categories (e.g., solar, wind and biofuels) could replace fossil fuels and nuclear power without enormous capital, materials, land and environmental consequences. We believe that only the new energy technologies can provide us with a sustainable future. Even though there is widespread skepticism about new energy at the present time, we believe that, sooner or later, these transformative technologies are likely to be developed, even though they will be disruptive to the existing energy industry. A number of questions come to mind: should the DoE establish an R&D laboratory for all clean renewable energy concepts, leaving no stone unturned in its search? If a breakthrough in clean, cheap, decentralized energy were to find practical application, should these technologies be publicly or privately owned? How should their development and use be regulated? How can we ensure that the transition to a new energy culture will be as smooth as possible? How can the public be best served? We examine these questions in this concept paper and in the proposed work. The Big Picture It is difficult to overstate the enormous effect that abundantly available, pollution-free energy would have on humanity and the planet. The monetary economy does not reflect real costs of production, but largely only puts a price on human labor. In reality, energy powers the economy and always has, no matter what price the market may attach to various energy sources. Each of the epochal changes in the human journey, from the time that humanity’s ancestors left the tree and lost their opposable toes, has been due to exploiting new energy sources. Advances in stone tools and group hunting tactics allowed humans to become super-predators approximately 40,000 years ago, and allowed humanity’s range to eventually encompass all continents except Antarctica. Approximately 10,000 years ago, probably inspired by the gradual decrease in easily hunted meat, the Domestication Revolution involved the first locally stable energy sources–domesticated plants and animals–and civilization thereby developed. The next epochal revolution, the Industrial Revolution, exploited the energy of hydrocarbons extracted from below the earth’s surface. It is estimated that in today’s advanced industrial societies, more than 10 times the gross energy per capita is consumed than in the advanced agricultural societies, and at more than twice the efficiency of conversion into useful work, so that citizens in today’s advanced industrial economies benefit from nearly 30 times the energy output than their agricultural ancestors. The dynamics arising from the energy paradigms for those societies have had profound, and not always obvious, features. Before the Domestication Revolution, the only possessions that people could enjoy were what they could carry in their arms or on their backs. With the local and stable energy sources that domesticating plants and animals provided, people began constructing robust shelters, professions began, and economic, political and social hierarchies developed. These hierarchies are an inevitable result when energy scarcity defines a society, including modern societies. Early civilization saw humanity’s first potentates and slaves, and the elites of virtually all civilizations have engaged in conspicuous consumption as a mark of their status. Slavery and other forced labor institutions flourished until the Industrial Revolution. With the rise of machines and the energy to run them, forced labor was no longer economically necessary or feasible, especially considering the innate desire in all humans for freedom. It is also no coincidence that women became liberated during the industrialized era. In very real terms, energy equals choice, which is another way of saying that energy equals freedom. In today’s world, societies that have the highest per-capita energy consumption generally have the greatest freedoms. If a society loses its energy sources, it will lose its freedoms. Conversely, if an abundant energy source becomes available for Americans and all humanity, an unprecedented epoch of the human journey will be possible. Americans consume about 80 times the energy that goes into their diets. Only about a billion people on earth today live in industrialized civilizations that consume large amounts of energy. There is not enough hydrocarbon energy available on the planet to provide all of humanity an industrialized lifestyle, and it is clear that the hydrocarbon age is nearing its conclusion. Whether Peak Oil becomes a reality for humanity this year or in a hundred years is a relatively fine distinction in the broad perspective of the human journey. War, air pollution, and the steeply hierarchical economic, political and social systems of humanity are all, at their root, based on energy scarcity. If all humans had ready access to a thousand times their dietary calories, or ten thousand, and the production of this energy had no environmental impact, earth and humanity would be transformed in ways we can only imagine:
This list may seem utopian to some, but we are convinced that it is all quite feasible if humanity were to enjoy abundant, decentralized, non-polluting energy. Whether or not these potential changes are realistic, however, it is clear that there will be great benefits to society with free energy. The potential benefits are so great, and the dangers of relying on traditional energies sources are so overwhelming, that it is incumbent on us to proceed in the event the research does prove out a new energy science and the mainstream skeptics are wrong (as history has so often shown). Proposal We propose that (1) we study the public’s attitudes toward a new energy future for humankind, and (2) we establish a voluntary advisory group of independent and knowledgeable citizens to make recommendations about a DoE R&D program and devise scenarios for the transitions to and implementation of new energy. Included would be polls of attitudes toward the basic hypothetical question: if one or more breakthrough energy technologies were to prove to be viable, what safeguards do we need to implement to prevent the abuse of these technologies? The two of us have thought through these questions for a long time in collaboration with numerous colleagues. We would convene an advisory group that would periodically report to the DoE with its recommendations. Personnel We each have had decades of experience in the new energy field in many capacities: faculty research and teaching at leading universities, advisory positions to the U.S. Government, business development, writing and experience in bringing alternative energy technologies to the marketplace. We have witnessed several demonstrations of proofs-of-concepts of breakthrough new energy sources in laboratories throughout the world. We have both written extensively about the cultural impact of various scenarios for creating a new energy future for humanity. The proposed study will be a continuation of those efforts. Our
request for only $1, in addition to travel expenses, reflects the
principle that, in an abundance paradigm, humanity will begin to
realize that some things should be our birthright: clean water, food,
shelter, clothing, and energy. We cannot continue to pollute
the biosphere with dirty energy as we have in the past. Several
environmental tipping points are coming closer and may have already
been exceeded. Central to our very survival must be a revolution in
our approach to energy.
Further Obstacles and Opportunities Not only is the scientific credibility of new energy questioned by many traditional scientists. Also, the prospect of taking such a quantum leap is likely to disrupt the way we do business in the world. We believe that these energy technologies have been suppressed in part because of the perception that existing economic and power structures would be devastated by a new energy economy. In fact, there are many credible, extant testimonies by insiders and others that such disruptive technologies have already been extensively developed by covert interests, both governmental and private, and have been kept from public awareness because of their threat to the world’s power structure. Considering the urgency of the global environmental crisis and the fact that black projects may be already addressing the questions of free energy and anti-gravity propulsion, we the people need to participate in the process of deciding our collective future instead of remaining in ignorance. Regardless of governmental policies, we believe it is likely that someone, somewhere will develop breakthrough clean energy technologies for public use. It would seem prudent for the public and the U.S. DoE to become educated about the true options that lie ahead. Do we have the courage to embrace a new energy future? Can we make the necessary political, economic and social adjustments to create a sustainable future for humankind? Conclusion In the final analysis, we are going to have to learn how to live in balance with nature. We are poised on the brink of our next evolutionary step. Key to understanding all this is our choice about what kind of energy culture could benefit us most. For our own survival, now is the time to have that discussion. If we do not take this step, and learn to live in harmony with nature, we face extinction. Therefore, it is incumbent on us to examine all candidate energy sources that could fulfill the mandate for a sustainable civilization. ================================================================================================================ |
|
|
Unlearning >
Free energy |
