// bienvenue / benvenuto / receptión / willkommen / welcome //


 

  OBJECTS, ONTOLOGY & STUFF



TODAY'S ANALYSIS IS HERE

 

                                                henry laycock

some downloadable academic writings

an emphasis on material fluidity

the aesthetics of the net 

contemporary violence 

and personal views

Fluid behaviour slosh .... plop simulations ....  go full screen!!

Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count; everything that counts cannot necessarily be counted - Albert Einstein
 
Nature loves to hide: Heraclitus*

1. THE PRIORITY OF METAPHYSICS AND ONTOLOGY
HEGEL'S CRITIQUE OF THE CRITIQUE

'We ought, says Kant, to become acquainted with the instrument, before we undertake the work for which it is to be employed; for if the instrument be insufficient, all our trouble will be spent in vain. The plausibility of this suggestion has won for it general assent and admiration; the result of which has been to withdraw cognition from an interest in its objects and absorption in the study of them, and to direct it back upon itself; and so turn it to a question of form. Unless we wish to be deceived by words, it is easy to see what this amounts to. In the case of other instruments, we can try and criticise them in other ways than by setting about the special work for which they are destined. But the examination of knowledge can only be carried out by an act of knowledge. To examine this so-called instrument is the same thing as to know it. But to seek to know before we know is as absurd as the wise resolution of Scholasticus, not to venture into the water until he had learned to swim.'Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences

 


Bienvenue / benvenuto / receptión / willkommen / welcome /

to an organic dossier of finished & unfinished work

& diverse other items and materials

with an emphasis on matter, fluidity and change

 


2. THE ORIGINAL INSIGHTS......


All things,  Thales held, come out of water and are resolved into water. (Aetius)

 

Thales declared water to be the beginning and the end of all things. As the water solidifies, things acquire firmness; as it melts, their individual existence is threatened. (Hippolytus, Refutatio)

It scatters and it gathers; it advances and it retires. (Heraclitus, Fragments 40)

The Unlimited is the first principle of things that are. It is that from which their coming to be takes place, and it is that into which they return when they perish. (Anaximander)       

Anaximenes declared that the essence of things is one and unlimited ... it has the specific nature of air, which differs in rarity and density according to the kinds of things into which it forms itself. (Simplicius, Commentaria)

Everything flows and nothing abides; everything gives way and nothing stays fixed. (Heraclitus, Fragments 20)


 

                                                      

'When we consider and reflect upon Nature at large, or the history of humankind, or our own intellectual activity, at first we see the picture of an endless entanglement of relations and reactions, permutations and combinations, in which nothing remains what, where and as it was, but everything moves, changes, comes into being and passes away. We see, therefore, at first the picture as a whole, with its individual parts still more or less kept in the background; we observe the movements, transitions, connections, rather than the things that move, combine, and are connected. This primitive, naive but intrinsically correct conception of the world is that of ancient Greek philosophy, and was first clearly formulated by Heraclitus: everything is and is not, for everything is fluid, is constantly changing, constantly coming into being and passing away.' Engels, Socialism, Utopian & Scientific

 

fire / air / water world_sebastiao_salgados

 

 AND THEN................ the 2000 year crystallization.....



The Philosopher and his Categories 

NEW LIGHT ON THE CATEGORIES IN 2007!! - HERE!!

 

 

 

 

valuable links mostly relevant to stuff, ontology, etc:

 

 jeff pelletierjeff 

van quine van 

phil. of chemistryhyle

   marksteen 

  chalmers papers 

 crawford elder page

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 

   

 

 

One.Many.Much

The book seeks to resolve the so-called ‘problem of mass nouns’ — a problem which cannot, it is argued, be resolved on the basis of a conventional system of logic. It is not, for instance, possible to explicate assertions of the existence of air, oil, or water through the use of quantifiers and variables which take objectual values. The difficulty is attributable to the semantically distinctive status of non-count nouns — nouns which, although not plural, are nonetheless akin to plural nouns in being semantically non-singular. Such are the semantics of a non-singular noun, that there can be no such single thing or object as the thing of which the noun is true. However, standard approaches to understanding non-singular nouns tend to be reductive, construing them as singular expressions — expressions which, in the case of non-count nouns, are true of ‘parcels’ or ‘quantities’ of stuff, and in the case of plural nouns, are true of ‘plural entities’ or ‘sets’. It is argued that both approaches are equally misguided, that there are no distinctive objects in the extensions of non-singular nouns. With plural nouns, their extensions are identical with those of the corresponding singular expressions. With non-count nouns, because they are not plural, there can be no corresponding singular expressions. In consequence, there are no objects in the extensions of non-count nouns at all. In short, there are no such things as instances of stuff: the world of space and time contains not merely large numbers of discrete concrete things or individuals of diverse kinds, but also large amounts of sheer undifferentiated concrete stuff.  Metaphysically, non-singular reference in general is an arbitrary modality of reference, ungrounded in the realities to which it is non-ideally or intransparently correlated. 

Tom  McKay and Adam Sennet both rightly observe that the subtitle of the book should be more along the lines of ‘Considerations towards a Semantics, Ontology, and Logic for Non-Singularity’, rather than the bolder project which the actual subtitle suggests. Absolutely. The book initially had just such a subtitle; it was subjected to editorial veto, as unduly long. I greatly regret that I did not find some way around the obstacle, for as it stands, the subtitle is overly misleading. 

 


 

Russell's fantastic Principles of Mathematics  

'The intellect may be compared to a carver, but it has the peculiarity of imagining the chicken was always the separate pieces into which the carving-knife divided it' - Russell, 'The Philosophy of Bergson'. 

And so long as Russell is understood as alluding to the philosophical intellect, his remark is, it seems to me, bang on.

 

 

 the physical 'carving knife': water in a pool

 

 potatoes in a bag



and on the ground

 

 3.325   In order to avoid such errors we must make use of a sign- language that excludes them by not using the same sign for different symbols and by not using in a superficially similar way signs that have different modes of signification: that is to say, a sign- language that is governed by logical grammar--by logical syntax. (The conceptual notation of Frege and Russell is such a language, though, it is true, it fails to exclude all mistakes.)

 
 

 
 

3. THE MORE RECENT STATE OF PLAY

Below are what I take to be a few of the key documents in the development of the theory of non-count nouns and/or stuff. Other documents of interest are on the right.

  
Helen Cartwright In sadness 

Russell's fantastic Principles of Mathematics  #59; ch. 6 esp. #70 & #74; #127.

heraclitus.pdf ;  quantities.pdf amounts and measures

Vere Chappell's Stuff and things here

Chappell on Aristotle on Matter 

Strawson's Particular and General

Quine's Speaking of Objects

Hacker's Substance: The Constitution of Reality

George Boolos      values of variables

Mass Terms - the collection Some Philosophical Problems 

PLURALS

a KEY QUANTIFICATIONAL CONCEPT!!??  SOME WATER 

THE PERSONAL PROJECT  

'opening the can' 

 (But what happens to the worms?) 

Rather than pursuing those familiar reductionist strategies which simply take for granted the adequacy of  the predicate calculus or of a formal object ontology, I sponsor the desirability of  taking at face value the intuitive contrast between stuff and things - even though some stuff is things.

Topics on General and Formal Ontology 

the self in question

 email me

my own most recent work: OSO 

initial attempt:Principia piece

"Words without Objects is an enjoyable polemic that grapples with some of the interesting and confusing issues of non-singularity, bringing semantic, ontic and logical considerations to bear on the puzzling phenomenon of non-singular nouns ... The book is a worthwhile read for anyone interested in some of the philosophical considerations regarding the many and the much ... it contains some very insightful and interesting arguments about a very difficult topic, and provides some delightful philosophical back-story."--Adam Sennet, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 

 

Laycock's recent monograph constitutes a welcome addition to the literature on the mass/count distinction, especially since it marks the first published book-length examination of these issues by a philosopher....Despite a voluminous literature on the mass/count distinction since the 1970s, primarily conducted from the perspective of model-theoretic semantics, I agree with Laycock's assessment that, in many ways, this area is still very much uncharted territory, particularly as its ontological significance is concerned.... I very much hope that Laycock's monograph will inspire, as it should, a resurgence of interest in what is after all, as George Boolos's seminal work on the semantics of plurals and second-order logic has shown, a prime breeding ground for questions concerning meaning, truth, reference, and quantification.... Laycock's view is certainly sufficiently provocative and intriguing in its unfamiliarity to warrant examination in the literature.... What is especially provocative and puzzling about Laycock's views.... is his position concerning the semantics of 'pure' non-count nouns, as well as the ontological and logical implications which, in his opinion, flow from this semantics....

What is novel about Laycock's approach is what he makes of these purported connections, in semantic, logical, and metaphysical terms. As the title of his book indicates, we are, in his view, dealing here with a category of 'words without objects'. Because such a category is unfamiliar to us and, if Laycock is right, cannot be accommodated in our familiar thinking about meaning, reference, truth, and logic, we have been at pains either to ignore its existence or to reduce it to the category of singular count-nouns with which we are more comfortable. Whoever engages in serious talk involving 'quantities', 'instances', 'aggregates', 'parcels of matter', and the like, in connection with such pure NCNs as 'air', 'water', 'ice', and 'mud', is, in Laycock's view, guilty of what he calls the 'strangely mesmeric tendency to privilege the singular' and of imposing an 'alien logic' on a class of expressions which deserves its own status.

Since, as far as I can see, Laycock's charge affects all of us who have ever written on the count/ non-count distinction, his sweeping indictment and, as well, the new direction he suggests, deserve to be taken seriously.... given its wide-ranging and shattering break with our familiar semantic, logical, and metaphysical tradition, I suspect that, for many of us, Laycock's study contains too few details to cure us once and for all of our deeply engrained tendency to 'singularize'.... In sum, if Laycock is right, then we have all suffered for a long time - in fact, to be precise, since the time of the Presocratics - from something like a collective delusion, viz., the 'singularizing tendency'; its accompanying object- and identity-involving semantics, logic, and metaphysics is tailored specifically to the needs of singular count-nouns. The possibility of an apparent mass deception of this sort and its possible causes are of course worth investigating.

 

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, March 2007

Kathrin Koslicki, Tufts University

 

In this approachable, philosophically -oriented book, Laycock offers a 

‘descriptive metaphysics’ . . . of stuff or matter” and addresses “the formal behaviour, including that under the quantifiers, of a large and central set of non-count nouns. . . . sometimes called mass nouns” (p. ix).....I wholeheartedly recommend this useful, stimulating and worthwhile book to anyone who wants to think about the topics it addresses.

PHILOSOPHICAL BOOKS, JULY 2008, STEPHEN K MCLEOD, UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL

It's a little stuffy in here

{a fairly new and seriously undeveloped blog spot)

MY TOTALLY DOWNLOADABLE RESEARCH PAGE HERE

                            
                      Linguistic and Philosophical lInvestigations

 Topics on General and Formal Ontology (Paolo Valore ed.)

 

 to see a world in a ... bowl of miso soup

[click n wait]

 journal/my.stuff link Analysis

 

 

 

4. OTHER OBSERVATIONS,CONNECTIONS AND GENERALISATIONS

                        frequently

Metaphysics is                    the finding of bad reasons for what we believe upon instinct

F. H. Bradley, modified by myself

... but no less frequently, it is the finding of bad reasons for what we                                    believe upon instinct

              find it quite impossible to  ..

(but again, instinct is not always a guide to truth)

. 

 

All fixed, fast frozen relations…are swept away

all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify

All that is solid melts into air

all that is sacred is profaned ... 

Marx & Engels on modern bourgeois society


philosophy for all wikiphilosophy 

4 ENCYCLOPEDIAS, some only for subscribing institutions

Stanford  here 

Britannica here

Internet here

Columbia here

 

EN FRANCAIS 

 grammatical number

phil. of language ryckman

the reality of negative facts 

 MARX low marx  capitalism & slavery

the Romanian conection 

 
 

. 

Rachel Carson's role: 'Three key events mark out modern environmentalism' s beginnings. The first was the publication in 1962 of Silent Spring, the devastating indictment of the effects of large-scale spraying of agricultural pesticide on American wildlife by Rachel Carson (the centenary of whose birth was celebrated last month). That woke people up to the fact that we were visibly harming the natural world on a large scale...'    MORE....


 

 

 

what's this? 

stuff definition 

QUANTITY 

fluids & molecules  


Vanbrakel on chemistry                 and mass terms
 
Koslicki Semantics of Mass  Predicates
 
RachelCarson 
 (more below)

In fond memory: p.f.s 
 

 Strawson'sparticular and general 

 mass terms

and cognition 

measures and

distinguishability 

 alan sidelle on

sweaters 

zimmerman on

'masses' 

is matter non-particular ?

Integrated philosophy Blog 
 
 
 
Australasian Journal of Philosophy Review
 
(you may need to be inside a subscribing institution to access some of the linked items) 
 

L'Association canadienne de philosophie / The Canadian Philosophical Association

in praise of neighbours


 

ONTOLOGIE

METAPHYSIQUE  

Le Conseil des Canadiens / The Council of Canadians 


A little beauty - our beloved  neck of the woods - Quebec - St Laurent - Ontario East

 

 




Sign in  |  Recent Site Activity  |  Terms  |  Report Abuse  |  Print page  |  Powered by Google Sites