Provoke your thoughts...
The Government of Alberta wants
to see water allocated to ‘higher value uses’, however the definition they use
equates ‘higher value use’ to a more ‘economically beneficial use’. Translation: A Higher Value Use is one that will increase the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Question? Which one of the following translates into a higher increase in GDP? a) Canoeing with your friends on the North Saskatchewan River b) Having a family picnic on the banks of a healthy stream or swimming in a clean lake c) Traditionally harvesting fish from a lake that has served your family for generations d) Having a drink of water from the tap e) Irrigation for small-scale family farm f) Development of a new mine in the tar sands or construction of a hydroelectric dam Answer: f. And this is exactly
where water markets will allocate water at the expense of a, b, c, d & e. 624days since Google More and See for yourself!Instead of going to the public of input, the GOA commission three committees to provide them with recommendations. Not only is this a problematic form of top-down democracy, but it is concerning to see that none of the recommendations call for prioritized and preserved water rights for our families, our ecosystems and our future generations - worse all three committees call for water markets as a way to manage water allocation in the future.
Minister's Advisory Group 'Recommendations for Improving Alberta's Water Management and Allocation' Alberta Water Council WATSUP Report 'Recommendations for Improving Alberta's Water Allocation System' Alberta Water Research Institute 'Towards Sustainability: Phase I – Ideas and Opportunities for Improving Water Allocation and Management in Alberta' |
Sign in|Report Abuse|Print Page|Remove Access|Powered By Google Sites

