The Truth about Tethering:


New Yorkers deserve laws based on facts. 

 Not fear.

 

  •  Humane restraint safeguards both pets and the community.  Loose running dogs are a nuisance and may bite.
  • Cornell University study found that proper tethering is a safe and humane method of confinement.
  • Solid, dog-proof fencing is expensive and not permitted in some areas.
  • Anti-tethering laws may negatively impact poor, rural, and minority communities.
  • Anti-tethering laws may sound humane, but may actually do more harm than good.
  • Animal rights extremists deliberately distort statistics – there is no factual basis for anti-tethering laws.

Responsible owners need all options to humanely confine their dogs!

  • The CDC does not support anti-tethering laws
  • The AVMA does not support anti-tethering laws
  •  Anti-tethering laws are the latest craze
  • Strict leash laws safely, humanely control and contain dogs

Caring owners  exercise caution and adequate supervision of their dogs, regardless of the restraint  method they choose.