Excerpt:

"We do not have to search very far for the only force known to man that could cause the satellite to "hang" there motionless just as well over a hundred of them are doing as we speak. Would not electromagnetic forces in perfect balance top and bottom throughout that 165,000 miles of invisible "tubing" allow the satellites to be popped into a slot anywhere along the tube and hang there essentially motionless?"             

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Geostationary Satellites in a Geocentric Universe ( takes 20 seconds to load pdf file ) - HERE

 

Geostationary Satellites - HERE

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Question:

We can't get to the altitude of 22,236 statute miles above mean sea level to prove that there is no orbital

movement of the "geosynchronous" satellites.

Answer:

to be falsifiable it must be logically possible to make an observation

or to do a physical experiment that would show the assertion to be false. Scientists have asserted that no emperical hypothesis, proposition, or theory ( like the "geosynchronous" proposition )

We ( geocentrists ) have the observational evidence, while they ( heliocentrists ) must assume Earth's rotation.  And if you assume rotation, you have to assume Earth orbit around the sun, another violation of what we observe. These assumptions cannot be made without also assuming the atmosphere velcroed to the Earth at 67,000 MPH; reversing the observed moon's direction of travel and speed; and denying the observational and photographical evidence of the stars going around every 23 hours and 56 minutes.

The heliocentrists get off too easily by just assuming geosynchronous movement of those geostats.  This whole package of assumptions goes with their first assumption.  And, lest we forget, observational validation is science; assumptions which contradict observational validations must be accounted as invalidated hypotheses.  This is not the way to truth in science.

Then, of course, for any who might claim to be Bible-believing Christians (or open to being such), there is the hard Scriptural insistence that it is the sun that moves and not the Earth...with not a single verse supporting heliocentricity.

On top of all this, throw in the now documented FACT that heliocentricity is one of the indispensable components of the Big Bang Paradigm which is now known to be an alternate "creation scenario" of the Pharisee Religion derived from ancient Rabbinic writings in the mystic Kabbala... These "Sages" also supply the 15 billion year age of the universe that makes possible the alleged 4.6 billion year old Earth and all the factless evolutionary fantasies leading up to the origin of mankind.  The whole world has been told the lie that "evolution science" ( which, of necessity, includes heliocentricity ) is "secular science".  It isn't.

Personally, it appears to me that what I have in the new link on the geosynch/geostat debate about the "virtual geostats" going both clockwise and counterclockwise could well be the elusive classic flaw in the helio model. 

 

Given the above--amplified and explained appropriately to any open-minded audience--I believe the available ammunition geocentrists have is totally capable of rebutting any dogmatic assertions or firefights that the heliocentrists care to--or dare to--enter into.....We should unload the whole clip on them any time they provide the opportunity." Marshall Hall

 

                                                                  Moving-Earth DECEPTION - HOME