|
Moving-World DECEPTION!! ~ homepage-two -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Scientists are more imaginitive than we are in Hollywood," says Jeffey Silver, producer of terminator Salvation and 300. "I used to say, that only happens in the movies, but now I say, that only happens in science."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Revolt Against Heliocentricity Now Brewing:
The Heliocentricity Model is one of the five essentials of The Big Bang Evolutionary Paradigm: 1. Big bangism 2. Expanding universe 3. Fifteen billion year old universe 4. Heliocentricity 5. Relativity All of those essentials form an "alternate creation scenario" promoted by anti-Christ, anti-Bible Pharisaic Kabbalists. If one concludes that Geocentrism is 'unique' science based "solely on a supernatural/theological position" then what can one conclude about the 'unique' science based "solely on a supernatural/theological position" of another religion which contradicts the Bible on every major doctrine (and, of course, hates Jesus and has Him boiling in crap in hell)? Instead of starting with the Geo/helio controversy--the truth of which is indispensable to both theological positions, perhaps we should start with the Religions and their Holy Books and the God/g'd which is behind these theological positions? When that is done - using only facts and excluding assumptions based upon other assumptions...along with the willfully deceptive "secular" science claim...... and certifiably fraudulent use of virtual reality technology - one is faced squarely with deciding which religion and which God/g'd one trusts. And, oh yes, it is useful to note the admitted theological position of the Pharisee Kabbalists is that Satan is their g'd. The heliocentricity keystone of the Kabbalist Kosmos is pure illusion in defiance of all observational evidence. Marshall Hall ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alice in HeliocentricityLand:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A Universe that has 'Relative-Motion' Only versus Absolute Motion CANNOT be Proven--only Assumed: Relative motions do exist in reality just not "relative only" motion, which insists there is no one reference frame that is absolute. However, even absolute motion is relative to that one absolute reference frame. However, all motion is not just relative motion. The difference is that Geocentrism (GC) claims one absolute reference frame by which all other motions can be measured against versus the claim of Acentrism (AC) that any number of reference frames can be used in relation to one another and are all equally valid with respect to each other ... Absolute motion cannot and would not even be reasonably questioned unless one assumes the universe only contains relative motion... There is no basis for this assumption except to explain why absolute motion is not true (circular reasoning)! In both cases the assumption that absolute motion does not exist and is thus only relative motion is used to 'create' and 'interpret' the observations. Those ‘perils of insight’ are then used to claim the most ridiculous things as scientific ‘facts’...???...The foolhardiness in all of this as well as the only value and purpose in even suggesting it is to ‘explain” why and how the Earth looks motionless both experimentally (MM, MG, SAGNAC) and observationally (geocentrically) but is somehow lying to all of us despite the best efforts of science to detect its motions!?...... (except of course for the geocentric equivalent motions...imagine that?!). Since the experiments demonstrated the Earth’s motions could not be measured (except of course for the geocentric equivalent motions... imagine that?!) then the experiments must therefore be evaluated with a physics 'reformulated' so as to show the very thing we were trying to determine with that physics experiment...!?!? Modern science has allowed its conclusions to determine the correct answers to the questions that determine if their assumptions are true or not!?............. It is no wonder that today’s science claims to always have "the best answers" even if they are rarely the correct answers. Allen Daves -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- First Annual Catholic Conference on Geocentrism - Saturday, November 6, 2010 - South Bend, Indiana (near Notre Dame) - More HERE ---------- Comment - "Some of these good people seem to believe the Machian Model which is highly technical but accepts the billions of light years distances and galaxies, etc., and CANNOT BE BIBLICAL because of the impossibility of the stars getting around nightly as observed and photographed. The Machian Earth is "stationary" only in the "solar" system which itself is claimed to be scooting around the Milky Way every 250 million years at 500,000 MPH." Marshall Hall ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- “Black holes are kind of like talking mice – they only exist in our imagination! I find it amazing that “scientists” can be so gullible and dupe themselves with their own Mickey Mouse theories. The sad part is how they succeed in duping everyone else into believing their imaginary junk." Mark Masters ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Far too many of us have unknowingly bought into the thinking of 'materialistic science' [materialistic-only knowledge] and atheistic philosophy, which have ushered God right out of His creation by teaching that impersonal laws regulate everything. Impersonal laws exist, but they do not regulate everything...... God rules, not impersonal laws that merely react...... Besides overseeing the affairs of nations, the Creator and Ruler of the universe is directly and personally involved in His people's lives. He does not merely respond to those who trust Him -- He creates circumstances and events, and/or He directly intervenes to make things happen." Berean Daily Comment ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In order to understand these things we must understand the facts concerning "Spirit tutelage". The word tutelage is used to mean "guardianship" and/or divine ordinance. It permits man to be influenced by Good and Evil spirits who have the power to put "thoughts" into our minds. Temptations are what we term "evil" thoughts. Temptation by evil spirits is not a "divine ordinance". It results from what theologians call "the permissive providence of God." If the human race were not subject to "evil" influences [like the idea of Heliocentricity] as well as "good," there would be no purpose in God having given us an intellect and free will. The intellect enables us to analyze the thoughts which enter our minds. We make a decision. Then, by use of our free will we make our bodies put the decision of the mind into action. William Carr -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "This is a reply from a sincere, though seemingly willingly blind man, that touches on many things. The point he makes about a scientific "conspiracy" is one that I have only fairly recently understood the correct answer to. Namely, money. With money, those who create it determine where and how it gets spent. By controlling governments they control the research agencies. By controlling all the main scientific journals and the research agencies, they control the universities as regards what research is conducted, what gets published and what conclusions are acceptable. In short, the thousands of scientists alluded to by your correspondent are not engaged in a "conspiracy theory" at all, they simply tow the line, draw their salary and further their careers and reputations within their bit of a paradigm that is determined by the ones pulling the financial strings. All of these scientists can be completely unaware of the corruption and Devil-inspired agenda being orchestrated way above their heads. They will see the moral destruction of society going on all around them, but very, very few will stop to think out just what is going on." Neville T. Jones ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Christ the Creator - The Bible says that the universe was created by Jesus Christ, that He continues to govern the World, and that all authority was given to Him in both Heaven and Earth. Creation, not Evolution - "According to the Bible, the World is less than 10,000 years old. During the first six days of planetary history, the Earth, all life on Earth, all the stars, and the sun, were directly and supernaturally created by God. They did not come into being through a random, impersonal “natural” process, but were intentionally designed and created by an intelligent, rational, personal, and loving Creator." "If there was one thing that has been withheld from humanity that should concern it most is that we have been wrongly taught that death [the death of the physical body] is the end of the human journey." Nena "Creation was an act of the sovereign, good pleasure of God, equally that of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, for the purpose of manifesting His splendor, glory, almighty power, and wisdom." HERE -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Mainline scientists say that attempting to disprove a hypothesis is the practice of true science, whereas attempting to prove a hypothesis is the practice of pseudoscience. Consider the following three hypotheses: heliocentricity, evolution and relativity. Neither of them (not one of them) can be proven to be scientifically valid. So, what does one do? Do as the scientists do. Construct a series of null hypotheses (including built-in fallacies) for each one of them. When an adequate number of the series of three null hypotheses have been rejected, declare that heliocentricity, evolution and relativity are ready to be considered theories since the null hypotheses were unable to find cause for rejection (Explain why such a practice is not pseudoscience.)" Thomas Cobb ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Heliocentrists have five major arguments they unashamedly use in their efforts to prove that the Earth is orbiting the sun. None of these “proofs” have us observing any movement of the Earth, rather a. They all have us looking at something else other than the movement of the Earth relative to the sun. b. None of the “proofs” help us determine whether the universe and sun are revolving around the Earth, or if the Earth is rotating. c. Many, if not all, of these “proofs” rely on circular reasoning." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Ill-Darkinati's religion is based upon the Kabbalah, the Luciferian Philosophy, AND THE WORSHIP OF THE SUN (as opposed to THE SON) which is why they present "Helio-centricity" (which means "Sun-centered") before the eyes of an uncritical, trusting, and gullible public.  Double devil horn flashing silhouette with SUN in background. Barack Hussein Obama a.k.a. Barry Davis: Prince Hall Mason, Boule Society (Sigma Pi Phi, motto: Advisors To The King), Baphomet (devil horn) Sign Flasher, Zionist-funded, Jesuit Coadjutor, Zbig Brzezinski hand-picked puppet, Master Hypnotist using NLP (Neurolinguistic Programming), MK-Ultra Monarch Slave User/Abuser, pathological liar with NO allegiance to U.S. Constitution/Bill of Rights, fiercely loyal to his Masonic Oaths and Jesuit-SMOM [Sovereign Military Order of Malta] Knights of Malta masters. Function: continue playing role of mid-level manager ("President") convincingly…while neo-fascist twins Henry Kissinger/Zbig Brzezinski continue re-shaping world for "Global Elites" [Pharisaical Babylonian Talmudists]. InTheKnow7 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "As for the Geocentrism/Heliocentricity controversy, the proof for Geocentrism is that it is scientific. The fact that it is in the Bible (when the whole world has thrown out Geocentrism) proves the Bible has credibility as the source of scientific truth even if the “science establishment” and the whole world has accepted the Kabbalist Big Bang evolution model (which would not and can not exist without heliocentricity). True science proves the Bible, not the other way around. The Copernican Model consists basically of nine assumptions, all of which are false science. This is all in the False Science and False Doctrines audios." Marshall Hall If the Bible is not literal then you can't "know" what God's truth is until you first learn what "the truth" really is ...... and if that is the case then you can't rely on Scripture for truth, since you can't know it to be truth until after you learn what the truth really is!?... You can't go outside the Word of God to understand the Word of God and then claim that the Word of God is the ultimate authority for truth, because the ultimate authority would then be whatever "authority" that "interpreted" for you what the Word of God "really meant". Allen Daves. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Sun worship is not dead, it has just taken on more sophisticated forms. I've seen poetry by one of the early heliocentrists actually magnifying the sun. Baal is not dead. He has a new generation of ignorant worshippers. Even the so-called 'Christian' textbook publishers magnify heliocentrists like Copernicus, Galileo, and Kepler but practically ignore Tycho Brahe - the Noble Dane and the 'Prince of Astronomers' - his beliefs, his findings. He created the greatest naked eye astronomical instrumentation known to mankind. He took astronomy to a whole new level. This fact is undisputed. He knew about Copernicus' proclamations and rejected them on Scriptural and scientific grounds. King James delighted in the knowledge he learned in Tycho Brahe's laboratory." Biblicalscholarship.net ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eclipses a Miracle of God's Design: ... the beautiful symmetry of a solar eclipse is so precisely-designed that the mathematics and positioning of the solar system’s bodies reflect not “pure chance,” but rather the precision of a designer with skills like that of a master watch-maker who knows how to organize and position wheels and gears to “tell time.” The Creator God is the “master watch maker” who has ordered the heavens. Is it also just “pure chance” that the only place in our solar system where solar eclipses can be seen from a planet’s surface is Earth–the only planet where God has made human beings “in his [own] image” (Genesis 1:26)? No, it was created this way by design, as Genesis 1:14 records. Seeing “beautiful symmetry” in the heavens and then dismissing it as “pure chance” is a perfect example of the truth of Romans 1:20-23 and II Timothy 3:7. The first scripture prophesies that mankind will see the wonders of the creation, but give no glory or credit to the obvious Creator who is responsible for these wonders of Creation. Modern mankind, duped by evolutionary fantasies, “professes [itself] to be wise”, but becomes “fools.” The second scripture accurately describes modern science. It is “ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. Steven M Collins -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"In this mortal sphere the Enemy's Hollywood/Mass-Media Lie Factory has sown falsehoods upon more falsehoods - including the fictional existence of Aliens and Extraterrestrial Life, Alien Spacecraft, and deceiver Hoagland's "incredibly advanced" Secret Technologies - like layers upon layers of blankets packed upon suffering humanity." --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Global Management Team [ GMT/NWO/Illuminati ] are experts at 'creating reality' with control of media, international PR firms and of course Hollywood, which creates the perception of our collective worldview. What do you think PR/marketing/advertising is? It says do whatever you have to in order to sell the product, in short -- the science of lying." In The Know 7 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are You a "Scientist"? The old, superior definition of a "scientist" is a natural philosopher. The word "science" comes from the Latin root “to know”, and also means, “any systematic recorded knowledge”. But there exists natural knowledge and there exists also supernatural knowledge, or alternatively natural philosophy and supernatural philosophy. If a person calls himself a “scientist” and has no "knowing" or understanding of the supernatural world and incorrect "knowing" of the natural world then at best we should call him a "half-scientist" or a "half-knowist". The Sun's rotating helical path, and the Moon generating its own light in phases can only be explained as caused by supernatural means. If you know this then you are a "knowist" and therefore you are a scientist or natural philosopher, and a supernatural philosopher to boot. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The State also known as "The Government" (includes all State-funded science and technology agencies), a corporation not a land mass, and therefore a legal fiction, has unlawfully taken Godly Law and Government into its own hands and replaced it with Satanic law and Satanic government. According to the Bible, the State's power comes from Satan through the "spirits of demons" - HERE List of 12 science and technology organizations that are agencies of The State - HERE. The Holy Bible's Romans XIII declares that the State (includes all State-funded science and technology agencies) is evil - HERE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Astronomy Schmexperts - When someone purports to be an "expert," he or she may be manipulating you through one of several means. The first technique used by "authorities" is that unconsciously, most people readily believe what they are told, especially by those perceived as "authorities." If a doctor says x, most people tend to believe x, simply because he is labeled an "authority." Most people never consciously, critically examine what such "authorities" have to say, and therefore allow their brain's construction of reality to be manipulated by such "truisms." Keeping in line with our bicameral heritage this tendency also plays on people's unconscious desire for an external power to tell them what to do, just as a parent or supposed "government" does. Furthermore, such "schmexperts" usually refuse to accept or even look at any information that contradicts or threatens their "knowledge." Lawyers will rarely consider the use of common law - which would render them relatively useless in the legal system. Doctors rarely look at alternative and natural healing techniques because it would make many of their high-priced "medicine" (drugs) obsolete. In fact, in some cases the prescription given by doctors is worse than the problem. More HERE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The [New Feudal World Order] toadies are chosen and groomed for "higher learning" for their obedience. If they can nod their heads up and down to the most ridiculous things, they go to the head of the class. Any candidates for higher thinking flunk or voluntarily leave that ship of fools. There's something awfully bogus about the science they present and force-feed their zombies. The tight compartmentalization smacks of chicanery. SmokingMirrors ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Einstein & Darwin exhibits at TELUS World of Science - Three "Ill-Darkinati" goals in one traveling road show (i. moral relativity, ii. organic evolutionism, iii. anti-boy/anti-man feminism): 
"All the head-scratching about the physicist's short hand "mathematical" language is a point in itself. This is a language--esoteric and exclusive to be sure--but still a language. If it were forced to be put into plain prose the parts that Satan has used and is using to sell the Kabbalic Universe as "science" would be revealed, and then most any literate person could determine the source and quit scratching their heads." Marshall Hall TELUS World of Science also hosted the exhibit "Body Worlds & the Brain" which promoted the Illuminati culture of death. The Mission Statement of TWS reads: "We illuminate young minds with the limitless possibilities of science and technology." ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "You are correct if you look upon Mainstream News and Science Media, except for sports scores and such like, as being Massive Disinformation Operations." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Artwork - "Sun Orbits Earth" - by ThePerceivingEye
Music: The Song of the Moving Sun - HERE
"Of course the Earth is stationary! After all if it was moving all an aircraft would have to do is to rise in the air and stay there until the Earth had revolved sufficiently so that its destination lay below it. It could then land. The fact that aircraft have to move forward proves that the Earth is stationary!" "Rapunzel" --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Everyone interested in distinguishing Truth from Deception--scientific or otherwise--needs to understand the the kind of programming that has gone into computerized telescopes and cameras to get them to send back Virtual Reality Images (not 'real' by definition) which are being used to indoctrinate the world with spurious information about the makeup, size and age of the universe." Marshall Hall --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Space Not a Vacuum "The area between the Sun and the planets is called the interplanetary medium. It is often described as a vacuum, but this is not true. It is actually a turbulent area dominated by the solar wind, which flows at velocities of approximately 250-1000 km/s (about 600,000 to 2,000,000 miles per hour). Other characteristics of the solar wind (density, composition, and magnetic field strength, among others) vary with changing conditions on the Sun. In general, disturbances in the solar wind arrive at Earth 2-4 days after leaving the Sun - the CME on January 6-7, 1997 did not arrive at Earth until January 10, 1997. This CME belongs to a particular subset of CMEs, termed magnetic clouds, which usually have a greater effect on the Earth. The interplanetary space signature of a magnetic cloud is very distinct. The most easily recognized characteristics are strong magnetic fields and a large and smooth rotation of the magnetic field direction." Source --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Of course, NASA's stated mission is called its "Origins Program" which used the moon fakery as a jumping off place for their stated agenda: "To search for our cosmic roots". All space shots adhere to the program and agenda, whereby each mission is Missionary Work for the Pharisee Religion's Big Bang Evolutionary Paradigm of a universe swarming with extraterrestrial life initiated by the sprinkling of comet dust throughout a 15 billion year old universe...as dictated in the Kabbala as early as the 1st century A.D. The motive behind all this science-fiction? Destruction of the Bible's credibility on its foundational creation account of six days with zero evolution." Marshall Hall ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Heliocentrists Claim that the Accelerations due to Earth's Supposed Translational Orbit Around the Sun Cannot Be Detected: Thus, all the efforts and experiments done pertaining to relative verses absolute motion...... ever heard of Sagnac, Michelson Morley and Michelson Gale et al?...... it works no matter how many frames of reference you attempt to create or take away, or bundle or imagine...... the point is there is a difference between absolute and relative motion...... The point of reference is whatever is out there that orbits wrt the Earth at 23h56min4sec...... coz that is not the rotational rate of the Earth. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "......There is a logical absurdity here. It is the fact that in GR theory, which all the cosmology explanations depend on, the Earth's accelerations with respect to the Sun and Moon cannot be detected according to General Relativity (free-fall/equivalence-principle/inertia = gravity which proves his own argument is nonsense, for the force creating the four bulges still originates cosmically and not from the Earth itself. The fundamental fault of his argument is that he is trying to originate the forces acting on the atmosphere from the Earth... trying to have both of two incompatible things - he wants to have his cake and eat it too) ... and yet the Moon and the Sun are said to accelerate the oceans so as to cause the tides ... thus we have the Earth's accelerations both detectable and non-detectable with respect to the same bodies at the same time in the same way?!?! (Note: tides lead, not lag the Moon)......" Continued HERE, by Allen Daves ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unrelated: Create a currency: HERE, and HERE
A 1/5 ounce silver coin (or thereabouts) could be used practically, like to buy breakfast or lunch. And stores could package their product (breakfast or lunch) to fit the 1/5 ounce amount. With a small, practical initial step like this MILLIONS of people could start using these coins immediately, and different weights could come later. This would be the first big step in destroying the "Illuminati" monopoly hammerlock on currency. The Open Currency team is available to help bring together the pieces so that you can create your own medallions. A 1/5 ounce "ten" piece has not been done yet and would make a great solution. ---------- Snowclone: It's Not the Usury Stupid... It's the Violence Enforced Monopoly! - HERE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Einstein - Was He a Thief, a Liar and a Plagiarist? "Einsteins Relativity hypothesis rescued heliocentricity from the findings of over 200 experiments which showed that the Earth was NOT moving." Marshall Hall
Einstein: Relativity Hoax HERE. Plagiarist of the Century: HERE, HERE. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Critics Statement: The issue of whether the sun orbits the Earth, or whether the Earth orbits the sun, or whether they both orbit each other depends on how you want to look at it. This is an issue that doesn't affect anybody. It's like arguing whether maps are upside down. Why is "north" pointing to the top of the map? Why not turn the map upside down so that Australia and Antarctica are at the top? This is an issue that doesn't mean anything to anybody. It's wasting time to discuss it.
Answer 1: In terms of theology one position calls God a liar the other does not. In terms of science one is "the reality" the other is a "fairy tale". In both cases the effects are direct and real for both theology (how Scripture is applied or denied) as well as how the universe really works so as to obtain the greatest possible benefits by exercising the real possibilities that exist for future technologies and its benefits to mankind based on a real knowledge rather than just being content with a status quo of willful apathy and ignorance. Allen Daves.
Answer 2: The truth doesn't depend on "how you look at it". The Earth is either moving or it isn't. One is the truth and one is a lie. The Bible and all known science say it is the sun and not the Earth that moves. Maybe you don't care, but you don't want to include everybody in the world in that category, do you? If it's the Bible that you don't like because it's religious, then you won't like the other view either because it too comes from a "holy book" (Kabbala) of a certain religion (Phariseeism). You may change your mind if you check out the facts and how we've all been deceived on this matter. Marshall Hall ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Orbit - Path - Plane: The sun orbits the Earth because the Earth is the common "mean" for the sun's path. The path the sun takes is not a static and perfect circle. Take Mercury... it orbits the sun... that path orbits the Earth so Mercury can be said to orbit the Earth as well. The difference is one of primacy. Mercury is closer to the sun... the primacy would be based on its physical relationship to the sun or nearness to the sun. Mercury’s "first order orbit" is the sun... its "second order orbit" is the Earth because the Earth is further away. The nature of path the bodies take does not define an orbit... the orbit is defined by the common or "mean” point to any given path. The sun and moon have individual paths... however in all cases the one common mass point or mean mass point is the Earth. It is important to understand that no orbit has a perfect path. Thus all orbits are merely classified in terms of degree of perfection of their respective paths. There are almost circular orbits and there are highly elliptical orbits. The path will demonstrate the common mass or mean point in space to which that path shares some commonality with. The sun orbits the Earth... the moon orbits the Earth but they do not orbit in perfect circles nor do they even have the same degree of "perfection" in their respective paths. The key to fully understanding the nature of orbits is to find the common mass not just the common “point in space” which is really just a mathematical abstraction (albeit a useful one)...... The measure of usefulness is really dependent upon scale...... When the rotation is about a common point within a given body (or very small scales i.e. looking at the whole universe as a circle with a dot/Earth in the middle) then “point space” can be useful for describing the orbit/rotation. However, if the common point lay outside the body in question itself, then it is helpful to find the common mass to that orbit. Allen Daves. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Sidereal Rotation of the Heavens is the Reference Frame for Measuring Absolute Motion: Any change with respect to any given acceleration rate or lack thereof...... can be detected...... there is no difference between orbital and linear accelerations...... from any "rest position" to any acceleration rate can be detected...... any change to any given acceleration rate can be detected...... this includes an acceleration that experiences deceleration or an acceleration rate that continually changes...... ie...... let's say a car is accelerating at 3 feet per second squared...... now the change from the initial "rest state" to that acceleration rate can/will have been detected...... but now let's say that the acceleration rate itelf changes from 3 feet per second squared to 5 feet per second squared...... that change too will also be detectable...... the Earth's [supposed] acceleration rate around the sun is not the same...... it is always changing...... THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "RELATIVE MOTION" ONLY, except in imagination...... because all motion can be measured and detected wrt the same Reference Frame and that RF is the Earth/Sidereal RF...... however since the two choices are Earth or the background stars (sidereal) and there is no motion the Earth could have to account for the sidereal and solar time...... the motion is sidereal against the Earth...... thus the Earth is the Absolute Reference Frame and the Sidereal rotation of the heavens is the RF for measuring absolute motion - all motion is wrt the Earth but everything that is not at the Earth is also moving either with or against the sidereal rotational rate...... thus all motion must be added to or subtracted from the sidereal rotational rate...... The Earth is the absolute observational point for observing sidereal time/aether rotation and the sidereal time of the aether benchmarks all other motions within it. Allen Daves. [see also Moon Movement] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Critics Statement: All motion in the universe is relative, and for this solar system science uses the Sun as the reference frame, because it is the largest/center. Based on that it is relatively correct to say the Earth is moving. Joe Answer: Relative Motion Only...... cannot be proven only assumed...... and at that in spite of the fact that all motion observed has objective and measurable qualities and or effects...... thus the silliness here is coming from the ignorant statements of a man who apparently does not realize the mathematical difference between a Sun reference frame and an Earth reference frame...... THERE IS NONE! The choice of Ref frames determines nothing wrt motion, nor does it indicate anything other than your Choice. Thus if it is silly to suggest the Earth is not moving because all motion is relative, in spite of observational and experimental data, then ...lol... it is downright foolish to claim it is moving. What has size got to do with what is and is not in motion, except in ones theoretical head? Allen Daves ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Inertial Paradox. by Allen Daves: This is also the part of the standard relativistic physics theory and explanation that creates what can be referred to as "The Inertial Paradox". While gravitational acceleration of the Earth around the Sun cannot be detected due to "free fall" those very same accelerations produce the ocean tides. Thus the Earth's accelerations are both detectable and not detectable wrt the same bodies all at the same time?!?!...... This is of course nonsense...... However, this is "the nonsense" that tells us why the Earth's acceleration rate is constantly changing due to our elliptical orbit around the Sun but cannot be detected. NOTE: The following diagram further demonstrates the nonsense of the “free fall” explanation for why Earth's accelerations cannot be detected in the a-centric cosmology and its accompanying physics using Einstein’s own geometrical definition and relativistic mechanics of Gravity. This is the current official definition of gravity. This relationship between gravity and inertia is also known and addressed as Mach’s principle and stated in the “equivalence principle” of relativity. However, the reader will take note that the inertial paradox will still exist no matter how one defines gravity or its ultimate cause.
1. Unlike a "freefalling" apple to the Earth a stable orbit needs not one force but "three forces" to make the orbit work... one pulling toward the Sun, another pulling it away from the Sun and finally inertia to keep the whole thing running "indefinitely". 2. Mainstream Science (MS) states that all three forces are one and the same, namely Gravity; i. Gravity from the Sun to pull us down ii. Gravity from distant stars to pull us up iii. Gravity from distant stars also create inertia 3. When we travel wrt the distant stars any change in velocity of magnitude or direction which by definition is an acceleration, we experience "inertia"... that resistance to a change wrt motion. The "force" that is causing the inertia to keep our orbit going is the gravitational force of all those distant stars... therefore, the force that keeps our orbit going is the exact same force as the one pulling us toward the Sun! We can detect changes wrt V2 when travelling in a straight line or an arc but we cannot detect any changes if our arc completes a circuit and becomes a circle or ellipse!?!? 4. As long as there are no changes wrt those distant stars the "inertia" (any resistance to change wrt all those gravitational fields) will not be felt... but wait... if we only travel anywhere along arc "A" and either slow down or speed up then we will detect the changes wrt those distant stars' gravitational fields...... but if on the other hand our arc ever becomes a complete circuit or orbit then there will be no changes wrt those distant stars' gravitational fields to detect!?!? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- First Close-up Photos of Comet Hartley 2 Reveal a Space Peanut:
"I think this fake computer image speaks for itself regarding the 'nuts' of NASA. I do like the 'lights' beaming out of the peanut." Mark Masters "They didn't even hide the plywood board?" "What continues to strike me about this kind of claim is the casual use of the word "photo" and "image" as if they are equivalent in the sense of being equally real. But such casual interchanges provide that rubbery distinction between real and similar. This piece starts off by claiming these are photos, then--in the "deep impact images" link--it says the spacecraft is going to "snap" about 118,000 images, according to NASA. An image is something created, not snapped. They can put a predetermined image creator in the spacecraft's "snapping" software and it will produce exactly what it is programmed to produce. This practice has been going on for a long time as we can see in this NASA's Hanky Panky link: www.fixedearth.com/nasas_hanky_panky.htm ... The alleged "scientific" connection resting on the Einstein/Eddington cabal in 1919 has already been exposed by better critics than I ... 'Gravitational Lensing' is the latest pack of lies associated with all these deep space claims." Marshall Hall -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Information is not knowledge. Deep knowledge can only be acquired by living it every day for a long time." PinkyShow --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The private, foreign-controlled Federal Reserve OWNS N.A.S.A. - HERE
The Eccles Building of the Federal Reserve Board, 2001 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, District of Columbia. Eccles is similar to Ecclesiastes = "son of David, King in Jerusalem". ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Electromagnetic Force versus Gravity: "A small magnet can pick up paper clips. This means that the magnetic force applied on the paper clips by the tiny little magnet is more than the gravitational force the entire Earth can muster." -------------------- Neville T. Jones [paraphrased quotes]: "Gravity could be electrical in nature." "The aether is a medium for carrying electromagnetic energy." "The force of gravity could be coming from the negative polarity of the Earth." "The gravitational 'field' might not be produced by the World, but rather by the aether's interaction with the World. In this case, the field would not be emanating from the World." "In this new model, however, there is no mutual attraction between objects" "When the Moon hovers over the Mediterranean Sea, it produces no tide at all. Hmmm, funny business this 'universal' gravitation!" -------------------- "The fact that the Moon's distance from the Earth varies some 31,000 miles every two weeks is all the evidence needed to demolish all gravity claims. Gravity--as universally believed--would pull the Moon on in to Earth as it comes from apogee to perigee, and gravity could never allow the Moon to steadily overcome its closest distance from Earth at perigee and breakaway back toward apogee. Only the Biblical language (and God 'set them', Sun, Moon, Stars, Gen.1:17) explains the tracks all those entities are on and backs up the explanation with visual confirmation every day and night by all who have ever lived. (Tides are another very real phenomenon attributed to 'gravity': in this case with the Moon's gravity--estimated to be vastly weaker than the Earth's (and electromagnetism)--still reaching out over a quarter million miles and pulling the Earth in like a rubber ball to allow for two tides a day... I repeat: Get out the Worcestershire Sauce because there is again going to be an enormous amount of crow to eat amongst mainstream scientists and others of like mind.)" Marshall Hall -------------------- "The Plenum Aether - In adopting the position that a gravitational field is not caused by mass per se, but is rather a force connected in some way to the diurnal rotation of the heavens, it is necessary to revert back to the ancient concept of an aether, or fundamental, structural substance. Further, if this substance pervades everything in the universe, then it is called a plenum. Actual movement of celestial bodies such as the Sun, Moon and stars then becomes the resultant combination of three components of motion: rotation about an axis, traversal along or around a path, and the rotation of the plenum (in which the object's path is set) en mass about the World. Assumptions: 1. the plenum aether is a totally incompressible and non-viscous fluid. 2. The force of gravity is pressure produced by the aether." Neville T. Jones -------------------- "From my research over 35 years the existence of the aether is a reality. The experiments of Trouton and Noble, Sagnac, Michelson and Gale, Thirring and Lenze, and Fizeau all imply that the aether exists ... Over the years the existence and understanding of the aether has evolved as the basis for gravity and free energy effects at a micro and macro level. Laboratory experiments have shown that superluminal energy and information transfer has been effectively accomplished via aetheric engineering, which effectively eliminates the theory of relativity and its absurd views of physics and cosmology. The structure of the aether is summarized, as a superfluidic medium, including interrelationships of many of the basic universal constants describing physical phenomena with magnetic, electrical, and gravitic formulas ... My research and discoveries have led me to characterize the aether as follows: 1. A superfluidic particulate medium which pervades all space. [editor's note: simplified - superfluidity is a special phase of matter in which, when cooled to very low temperatures, viscosity of the fluid is very low (thin fluid), while heat capacity is very high (large heat transfer required for a small change in temperature).] 2. A medium, which in its various modes, is the building block of the physical universe. 3. A medium, which, in one of its modes, is responsible for gravity and inertia." More HERE by Dan A. Davidson -------------------- "The aether is a super dense medium aka the firmament that the Sun Moon and Stars are placed into ...the aether pervades all of space even the "empty space" between the nucleus of an atom and its electrons and even the "empty space" in the nucleus itself ... it is of "Planck density" and as such vibrations move through it faster than light can move through a vacuum ... what we call "a vacuum" ... is not ordinary matter for sure but it is the thing that ordinary matter is placed into ... it has measurable properties such as electrical resistance." Allen Daves "I believe that gravitation is simply vibrational harmonics in the aether in the same way that sand on a board with a speaker on top of it also shows patterns ... the patterns we see are demonstrated in the cosmic distribution of mass ... We however note that the atmosphere is "compressed" in that it is thicker at the bottom and thinner the higher you get, but the fact that the "compression" does not begin at the upper atmosphere, makes it look as if something were pulling down on it because we might expect a homogeneous compression pressure at all elevations or at least the greatest compression pressure at the point where the pushing begins in the same way a shock wave begins and moves though a smoke cloud - the compression is visible ... I believe that gravity is "low frequency pushing "acoustic" traveling through the aether ... However, I believe that although the frequency is very low ... The speed at which the wave travels (the wave traverses the entire diameter of the universe in 1x10superscript-11 (10 to the negative power of 11) of a second, based on the density calculations of Plank density) does not allow for the upper atmosphere to significantly compress before the lower atmosphere (closest to the Earth) is experiencing the same compression effects. This is to say that the gravitational wave affects the entire atmosphere for all practical purposes at the same time and under those conditions it would settle out thickest at the point closets to the Earth since that has the highest compression. It has the highest compression the closer to the Earth due to the fact that the gravitational wave is acting on the upper and lower atmosphere simultaneously but the additional atmosphere above the lower atmosphere is also acting on the lower atmosphere adding compression to the lower atmosphere such that it looks like it is being pulled rather then pushed ... I hope this was clear ... because I think it is an important point in pushing gravity and AVGM (Aetheral Vibrational Gravitational Model) as I model it." Allen Daves -------------------- "The firmament is an extremely dense medium that rules all physics in the universe. Compared to the firmament, the universe of atoms is nothing. We will show that the firmament is identical to the Planck medium that has been known to physics for over a century. We shall also show that the firmament is the light-bearing medium commonly called the ether, and that the luminiferous ether is redundant and unnecessary. The importance of the firmament is that it shields the creation from a true plenum. Also, the firmament acts as an anchor for the Earth, keeping it firmly in the center of mass of the universe. From a Scriptural perspective, the firmament is one more case where the Scripture knew the nature of space long before man discovered it. The firmament exonerates Scripture from the charge that its Geostatic/Geocentric approach is contrary to the truth. We also point out a fatal flaw in the space-time foam and virtual particle explanations of modern cosmology. We shall see that the plenum model of space historically appears long before the atomic model with its vacuum and void." from "The Biblical Firmament" by Gerardus D. Bouw, Pd.D. -------------------- END OF - Electromagnetic Force versus Gravity ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attached is a [ larger ] snapshot from Geocentric Universe 3.0 HERE. The World is in the centre and does not move. The universe rotates around the polar axis. The "ecliptic plane" is bounded by the red circle. That red circle goes around with the universe. The Sun only ever stays somewhere on that plane. If the Sun did not move relative to the plane of the ecliptic, then its trajectory relative to each of us and its position relative to the stars would be the same each day. But the Sun has a path (technically it is this path that is the "ecliptic", which is why we refer to the "ecliptic plane" or "plane of the ecliptic") and travels slowly around that path in the opposite sense to how the universe rotates about the World. This simple fact produces great variety, seasons and the apparent helical path of the Sun. (All praise be to God for this beauty, design and consideration.) Neville T. Jones:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Parable of the Mustard Seed "God begins everything He does in a small way; with a seed, an idea, a word, a baby. But then there is growth, increase and steady progress. Let us examine this spiritual concept of 'small beginnings' and steady growth and see how the Most High seeks to work in our lives. Matthew 13:31 - Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is like to a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and sowed in his field: 32: Which indeed is the least of all seeds: but when it is grown, it is the greatest among herbs, and becometh a tree, so that the birds of the air come and lodge in the branches thereof. Points to Note: i) The size of the seed, it was the smallest of all the seeds. ii) The man sowed it in his own field. iii) Its steady and continued growth, it became the largest plant in his garden The seed represents a characteristic of the Kingdom of Heaven. Initially it may appear of small account and not worthy of attention. But, like that tiny mustard seed God's truth [Bible Geocentrism] is infinitely powerful and once it takes root in the human mind it can become the most important thing in a believer's life. God's Kingdom: His Word, His Law, His power, His authority, His fame and His ever-growing influence over all things may initially appear insignificant and small: but never underestimate truth and its power. This fact is encompassed in the parable of the black mustard seed ... Never imagine that poverty, weakness or insignificance disqualifies you from being effective in the work of God's Kingdom. The lack of size, power, wealth, good appearance and talent are no handicap in spiritual matters ... Prayer is a mighty weapon. Prayer can do anything that God can do. Learn to pray; because more can be accomplished by prayer than by money, talent or even by hard work ... Never underestimate the power and potential of the seed of Truth. Its power is measureless. It is well able - if sown with prayer - to outgrow any plant in the garden. Remember the black mustard seed ... Never imagine that the Truth is unable to penetrate certain places. Like the ant, the spider and the lizard, truth can penetrate the palaces of kings. It can enter and flourish in any mind - if allowed to" More HERE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Back to homepage-one: HERE Forward to homepage-three: HERE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
