Nasopharynx is a difficult area to access surgically due to
1. Its central location 2. Its surrounding facial skeleton, skull base 3. Presence of great vessels and lower cranial nerves
Ideal surgical approach to nasopharynx should:
1. Provide adequate exposure to nasopharynx for tumor resection 2. Great vessels must be safely controlled 3. Lower cranial nerves should be spared - a difficult task indeed.
Surgical approach chosen is dependent on 1. Extent of tumor 2. Surgical expertise 3. Facilities available
Classification of surgical approaches:
!. Anterior approach 2. Inferior approach 3. Lateral approach
Anterior approaches: The following anterior approaches can be used to access nasopharynx.
- Lateral rhinotomy
- Transnasal transmaxillary approach
- Midfacial degloving
- Lefort I osteotomy
- Maxillary swing approach
Lateral rhinotomy: This approach
exposes the nasal cavity and choana well. It can be used alone or in
combination with other approaches to enhance exposure of nasopharynx.
This approach is useful in resection of anteriorly placed tumors.
 Figure showing lateral rhinotomy approach Transnasal transmaxillary approach: In
this approach lateral rhinotomy is combined with medial / subtotal
maxillectomy. This approach exposes the nasopharynx, ipsilateral
spheno-ethmoidal complex, pterygopalatine fossa and medial end of
infratemporal fossa. Midfacial degloving approach: This is a
bilateral transnasal, transmaxillary approach. The advantage of this
procedure is that it is performed via sublabial incision thereby
avoiding facial scar. In this approach infraorbital nerves on both
sides are safeguarded, midface is degloved subperiosteally up to the
level of root of the nose. Bilateral medial maxillectomy is performed
to improve exposure. The pterygopalatine fossa and the medial end of
infratemporal fossa is ideally exposed.  Figure showing midfacial degloving approach Lefort I osteotomy: In this approach
through a sublabial incision a transverse maxillary osteotomy is
performed through both maxillary sinuses allowing the whole hard palate
and both inferior maxillae to be down fractured. Access to central
skull base and nasopharynx is ensured without any visible facial scars.  Lefort I approach Maxillary swing approach:This is
one of the common approaches to nasopharynx. It exposes the nasopharynx
and surrounding areas from the anterolateral aspect. through Weber
Ferguson incision maxilla is separated from its bony attachments and
swung laterally intact with the masseter muscle and cheek flap. Access
to opposite side can be established by removing the posterior portion
of nasal septum. After tumor resection, the maxilla is swung back and
fixed to facial skeleton. Inferior approaches:Transpalatal
approach: Nasopharynx can be accessed by raising palatal mucoperiosteal
flap off the hard palate, separating the soft palate from its bony
portion. The posterior edge of bony hard palate is removed as much as
it is necessary to access the nasopharynx. Greater palatine
neurovascular bundle must be mobilized bilaterally to prevent flap
necrosis.  Figure showing transpalatine approach Mandibular swing approach:This is
actually a combination of transcervical, transmandibular, transpalatal
approach via Frazier incision. Soft tissues including parotid gland are
elevated from the mandible. Mid portion of the ascending ramus of the
mandible including the coronoid process is cut and removed to
facilitate exposure and to prevent post operative trismus. The lateral
and medial pterygoid muscles are divided to enter the nasopharynx.
Tracheostomy is a must to secure the airway. Dead space after tumor
removal needs to be repaired. Lateral approach: This approach is
via infratemporal fossa. This approach is limited by facial nerve and
carotid sheath. It is used when the tumor extends laterally to involve
the parapharyngeal space.
|
|