dariusztupaj

Recent site activity

320days since
Koniec roku

Start‎ > ‎

Walcownia :) (wyciskarka, magiel itp)

Czemu to ma służyć ?

10 July 2008, 12:49AM CEST by dariusz.tupaj (Dariusz Tupaj)  [updated at 9:42AM CEST]

Magiel to coś co zwykle wyciska ostatnie krople wody z wypranych ubrań. Pewnie wielu pamięta pralkę Franię. Ona zawierała w sobie taki prosty magiel z korbką. Jako dziecko lubiłem się tym bawić.
Generalnie mam dużo pomysłów z różnych dziedzin życia i liczę że ktoś kto odwiedzi tę stronę też będzie miał swój pomysł i się nim podzieli (mile widziane wszelkie pomysły z pominięciem tych nieetycznych i szkodzących komukolwiek).
Zadaniem tego działu będzie coś w rodzaju narady, burzy mózgów, mastermind-u, skojarzeń słownych z danym pomysłem Miejscem gdzie zamierzam "rozwałkowywać" różne pomysły nawet czasem całkiem teoretyczne.
Jaki jest cel takiego maglowania ?   - oczyszczenie pomysłu z samej tylko fantazji i znalezienie dla niego praktycznego zastosowania.
Najlepiej gdy pomysły i ich rozwój będą poparte zdjęciami, wyliczeniami, dowodami, filmami z youtube wskazaniem podobnych zastosowań już istniejących. Pomysł może dotyczyć usprawnienia czegoś co istnieje. Usprawnienie może dotyczyć konstrukcji, algorytmu, sposobu postępowania.

Myślę że narzędzia google wspaniale wspomagają takie rozważania więc będę ich tutaj możliwie często używał.

Znalezione w Copyplogger - Jak napisać artykuł w 20 minut

posted ‎‎Sep 7, 2008 1:32 AM‎‎ by Dariusz Tupaj   [ updated ‎‎Oct 15, 2008 12:08 PM‎‎ ]

How to Write an Article in 20 Minutes

od Copyblogger według Jim Estill

Skopiowałem na żywca z bloga a tłumaczeniem zajmę się w najbliższych dniach

Believe it or not, it only takes me 20 minutes to write a 400-500 word article. This article (which I wrote in 20 minutes) explains some of the tricks I use to accomplish this.

Uwierz lub nie napisanie artykułu zawierającego 400-500 słów zajmuje jedynie 20 minut. Ten artykuł (który napisałem w 20 minut) wyjaśnia niektóre sztuczki jakich użyłem dla osiągnięcia tego.





Blogging gives me a daily deadline, and I don’t really want to spend more than 20 minutes each day on blogging. Many of my blog entries are actually less than 500 words so take me less time.

Blogowanie codzienne jest dla mnie ostatecznością, i naprawdę nie chce poświęcić więcej niż 20 minut każdego dnia na blogu. Wiele z moich wpisów w blogu zawiera rzeczywiście mniej niż 500 słów, więc zajmuje mi to mniej czasu.

Taking up blogging got me to start thinking seriously about writing quickly, and you may be facing a blogging time-crunch as well. So here are my 8 tips for writing an article in 20 minutes or less.

Zabranie za blogowanie skłania mnie do poważnego myślenia o szybkim pisaniu i możesz być zdziwiony


  1. I start with a list of ideas and concepts I want to cover. Usually I write this list in point form. For me, I do this the old fashioned way, with a pen and paper.
  2. I often “incubate” an article for a few days (this does not count in the 20 minutes). What I do is start roughing out some topic ideas then leave it. Because I have thought about it, ideas tend to come to me that I frequently add to my points. Of course I always carry a notebook for ideas.
  3. I often need to reduce the number of ideas that I cover. Sometimes they do not fit with the angle of the article or do not flow with the other ideas. Sometimes I have to give up a point to write a good article.
  4. Never save a good idea. When I know I have many article deadlines to meet, it is tempting to “save” a few good ideas for later. New ideas will always come so always give your best ideas.
  5. Develop tricks to get past writers block. One way I do this is ”warm up” writing. I just sit down and write for 5 minutes. This tends to help subsequent writing to flow. Another way I do this is to go for a walk, cycle or a run (although sometimes I think I might use this to procrastinate a bit too). Another trick I use is to make a game out of the deadline – say I will do it by X o’ clock. Perhaps I am simple but this motivates me.
  6. Come back to it later. My best articles are written partly, revisited a few times, then finished. I spend the same 20 minutes, though only 5-7 minutes per session. Of course if the ideas are flowing well, I do keep writing.
  7. I often write 3-4 articles at the same time. Spending 5 minutes on one, 7 on another etc. When I am really in writing flow, this works well.
  8. One trick is using bullet points or numbered points as in this article. People seem to like this technique and it helps articles flow for me.

So if I can write so quickly, why don’t I write a few articles each day? Apart from the fact that I have a very full time job, writing is the easy part; coming up with the ideas is the tough part.

Ideas anyone?

About the Author: Jim Estill is the CEO of Canadian computer product company SYNNEX and the author of the Time Leadership blog and book.

Znalezione w copyblogger - Jak czytać

posted ‎‎Aug 28, 2008 2:19 AM‎‎ by Dariusz Tupaj   [ updated ‎‎Sep 7, 2008 1:38 AM‎‎ ]

A Ty jak Czytasz ?

Who needs to learn how to read?

After all, we all learned how to read fairly early in life, usually in elementary school, right?

But do you know how to really read?

More importantly, are you really reading?

Reading can make you a better writer, as long as you’re paying attention and leaving time to actually write. But what we’re talking about here is what you say, rather than how you say it.

If you haven’t noticed, competition in the world of online content is fierce. Anyone playing to win is searching high and low for information that others don’t have, which for many means subscribing to a ridiculous number of RSS feeds.

While seeking out novel information from a wide variety of sources is admirable, it doesn’t necessarily give you an advantage. The ancient Greeks had a label for those who were widely read but not well read—they called them sophomores.

As in sophomoric… not a second-year college student (I suppose there’s not really much of a distinction).

Scanners and Pleasure Seekers

We know that people don’t read well online. They ruthlessly scan for interesting chunks of information rather than digesting the whole, and they want to be entertained in the process. This is the reality that online publishers deal with, so we disguise our nuggets of wisdom with friendly formatting and clever analogies.

But that doesn’t mean you should read that way.

If you’ve been publishing online for even a small amount of time, you’ve seen someone leave a comment that clearly demonstrates they didn’t read or understand the content. Even more painful is when someone writes a responsive post that clearly misses the entire point of the original article.

While it happens to us all from time to time, you do not want to consistently be one of these people. Credibility is hard enough to establish without routinely demonstrating that you fail to grasp a topic that you’ve chosen to write about, whether in an article or a comment.

Plus, if you’re doing nothing but scanning hundreds of RSS feeds and reading purely to be entertained, you’re at a disadvantage. Someone in your niche or industry is likely reading books and reading deeper to become the higher authority.

Or they will after they read this article.

Information vs. Understanding

People often think of learning as an information-gathering and retention process. But being able to recall and regurgitate information is low-level learning compared with insightful understanding.

Bloggers are big on regurgitation. These cut-and-paste creatives add value to the world through a mash-up of sources, right? Maybe, but without the ability to understand and communicate what it all means for the reader, you’re simply passing on your reading obligations to others, and that’s not giving people what they look for in a publication.

On the other hand, if you understand everything you read upon a casual once over, are you truly learning anything new? The material that gives you an edge in the insight department is the stuff that’s harder to understand. In other words, the writer is your superior when it comes to that particular subject matter, and it’s your job to close the expertise gap by reading well.

You do that by moving beyond learning by instruction, and increasing your true understanding by discovery. For example, you read a challenging book full of great information, and you understand enough of it to know that you don’t understand all of it.

At that point, you can dive into the book again and read more carefully. You can go to supplemental resources. You can read other books. All that matters is you do the work rather than asking someone, and I guarantee you’re really learning in the process.

For example, next time you read a challenging blog post and you’re not clear on a point, your first inclination might be to ask a question in the comments. Instead, read the post again. If it’s still not clear, go do some research on your own to see if you can figure it out. Then when you finally do ask a question, you’re on an entirely different level of understanding and can likely engage in a meaningful dialogue with the author.

Instruction is important and beneficial. But true understanding comes from your own exploration and discovery along the path.

The Four Levels of Reading

Back in 1940, a guy named Mortimer J. Adler jolted the “widely read” into realizing they might not be well read with a book called How to Read a Book. Updated in 1973 and still going strong today, How to Read a Book identifies four levels of reading:

  • Elementary
  • Inspectional
  • Analytical
  • Syntopical

Each of these reading levels is cumulative. You can’t progress to a higher level without mastering the levels that come before.

1. Elementary Reading – Aptly named, elementary reading consists of remedial literacy, and it’s usually achieved during the elementary schooling years. Sadly, many high schools and colleges must offer remedial reading courses to ensure that elementary reading levels are maintained, but very little instruction in advanced reading is offered.

2. Inspectional Reading – Scanning and superficial reading are not evil, as long as approached as an active process that serves an appropriate purpose. Inspectional reading means giving a piece of writing a quick yet meaningful advance review in order to evaluate the merits of a deeper reading experience.

There are two types:

  • Skimming: This is the equivalent of scanning a blog post to see if you want to read it carefully. You’re checking the title, the subheads, and you’re selectively dipping in and out of content to gauge interest. The same can be done with a book—go beyond the dust jacket and peruse the table of contents and each chapter, but give yourself a set amount of time to do it.
  • Superficial: Superficial reading is just that… you simply read. You don’t ponder, and you don’t stop to look things up. If you don’t get something, you don’t worry about it. You’re basically priming yourself to read again at a higher level if the subject matter is worthy.

Stopping at inspectional reading is only appropriate if you find no use for the material. Unfortunately, this is all the reading some people do in preparation for their own writing.

3. Analytical Reading – At this level of reading, you’ve moved beyond superficial reading and mere information absorption. You’re now engaging your critical mind to dig down into the meaning and motivation beyond the text. To get a true understanding of a book, you would:

  • Identify and classify the subject matter as a whole
  • Divide it into main parts and outline those parts
  • Define the problem(s) the author is trying to solve
  • Understand the author’s terms and key words
  • Grasp the author’s important propositions
  • Know the author’s arguments
  • Determine whether the author solves the intended problems
  • Show where the author is uninformed, misinformed, illogical or incomplete

You’ll note that the inspectional reading you did perfectly sets the stage for an analytical reading. But so far, we’re talking about reading one book. The highest level of reading allows you to synthesize knowledge from a comparative reading of several books about the same subject.

4. Syntopical Reading – It’s been said that anyone can read five books on a topic and be an expert. That may be true, but how you read those five books will make all the difference. If you read those five books analytically, you will become an expert on what five authors have said. If you read five books syntopically, you will develop your own unique perspective and expertise in the field.

In other words, syntopical reading is not about the existing experts. It’s about you and the problems you’re trying to solve, in this case for your own readers. In this sense, the books you read are simply tools that allow you to form an understanding that’s never quite existed before. You’ve melded the information in those books with your own life experience and other knowledge to make novel connections and new insights. You, my friend, are now an expert in your own right.

Here are the five steps to syntopical reading:

  • Inspection: Inspectional reading is critical to syntopical reading. You must quickly indentify which five (or 15) books you need to read from a sea of unworthy titles. Then you must also quickly identify the relevant parts and passages that satisfy your unique focus.
  • Assimilation: In analytical reading, you identify the author’s chosen language by spotting the author’s terms of art and key words. This time, you assimilate the language of each author into the terms of art and key words that you choose, whether by agreeing with the language of one author or devising your own terminology.
  • Questions: This time, the focus is on what questions you want answered (problems solved), as opposed to the problems each author wants to solve. This may require that you draw inferences if any particular author does not directly address one of your questions. If any one author fails to address any of your questions, you messed up at the inspection stage.
  • Issues: When you ask a good question, you’ve identified an issue. When experts have differing or contradictory responses to the same question, you’re able to flesh out all sides of an issue, based on the existing literature. When you understand multiple perspectives within an individual issue, you can intelligently discuss the issue, and come to your own conclusion (which may differ from everyone else, thereby expanding the issue and hopefully adding unique value).
  • Conversation: Determining the “truth” via syntopical reading is not really the point, since disagreements about truth abound with just about any topic. The value is found within the discussion among competing view points concerning the same root information, and you’re now conversant enough to hold your own in a discussion of experts. This is what the “online conversation” was supposed to look like according to early bloggers, and sometimes, it does. But mostly, the online conversation looks like the unqualified, unsubstantiated opinions of the ill-informed, and you’re not looking to be part of that scene.

Be a Demanding Reader for the Win

Reading, at its fundamental essence, is not about absorbing information. It’s about asking questions, looking for answers, understanding the various answers, and deciding for yourself. Think of reading this way, and you quickly realize how this allows you to deliver unique value to your readers as a publisher.

If you think all of this sounds like a lot of work, well… you’re right. And most people won’t do it, just like most people will never blog or publish online in the first place.

That’s why your readers need you. They need you to do the work for them, because they don’t want to become an expert. So, it’s your job to understand the complex and grasp the essentials, then make it simple, easy to read, and entertaining.

You’re on it, right?

Zagadka matematyczna (po angielsku)

posted ‎‎Jul 19, 2008 3:26 PM‎‎ by Dariusz Tupaj   [ updated ‎‎Jul 19, 2008 4:07 PM‎‎ ]

This is not a trick question. This is a real math problem  so don't
say that a bus has no legs, etc.

           There are 7 girls in a bus.

           Each girl has 7 backpacks.

           In each backpack, there are 7 big cats.


           For every big cat there are 7 little cats.


           Question: How many legs are there in the bus?



          The number of legs is the password to unlock the Excel sheet.

 
Pierwsza odpowiedź jest celowo wpisana na chybił trafił. Zalecam trochę pomysleć i nie sugerować się wynikiem.

Formularz arkusza kalkulacyjnego Google

Jeśli się poddajesz i chcesz znać poprawną odpowiedź kliknij tutaj

Lista życzeń a spełnianie marzeń

posted ‎‎Jul 15, 2008 5:41 AM‎‎ by Dariusz Tupaj   [ updated ‎‎Jul 16, 2008 4:01 AM‎‎ ]

Jednym ze sposobów zbliżających do realizacji celów jest zapisanie ich sobie i ciągłe do nich zaglądanie. To niż że pierwotna lista z czasem ulegnie zmianie, ważne jest to że staramy się do nich dążyć. Nie popełnia błędów  tylko ten który nic nie robi. Nie bój się że twój cel jest dla kogoś śmieszny, spróbuj go zrealizować. Zapisz sobie i codziennie lub co tydzień zaglądaj do niego, oswajaj się z nim.
Dla mnie ta praktyka okazała się bardzo pomocna. Nie wystarczy że w pamięci trzymasz swój cel, jeśli go nie zapiszesz ulegnie deformacji i po jakimś czasie nawet nie będziesz wiedział o czym tak bardzo marzyłeś.
Ja jeszcze nie tak dawno postawiłem sobie za cel kupno bardzo konkretnego modelu aparatu cyfrowego. I dopiąłem swego celu dzięki bardzo częstemu poświęcaniu mu uwagi.

Kontynuacja
Warto wymusić na sobie określenie względnie realnego terminu osiągnięcia celu a następnie ustalić co i w jakim stopniu powinienem robić aby ten cel osiągnąć. To w znacznym stopniu pomaga zbliżyć się do celu. Następny krok to sukcesywna realizacja zaplanowanych działań (i odznaczanie ich na liście).

Znalezione w copyblogger

posted ‎‎Jul 10, 2008 12:34 PM‎‎ by Dariusz Tupaj   [ updated ‎‎Jul 15, 2008 5:52 AM‎‎ ]

10 Quick Tips for Building a Business Online

od Copyblogger według James Chartrand

Here are 10 quick tips for creating wealth, freedom, and personal satisfaction all at the same time based on my own experiences growing Men With Pens:

  1. Spend time thinking over your creative ideas and invest in careful planning. Myślenie o swoich ideach zdecydowanie pomaga je zrealizować (jeśli nie kończy się na myśleniu)
  2. Decide the goals and vision that matter to you most. Write it down and read it often. Zapisanie sobie najważniejszych celów i ich częste czytanie też mi nieraz pomogło
  3. Know your goal for now, and know where you want to be for each year to come. Myślenie o celu na TERAZ i  myślenie dalekowzroczne żeby wiedzieć dokąd chce się dojść
  4. Work on one idea at a time. Never splatter out with many ideas. It’s overwhelming. Grunt to się nie rozpraszać
  5. Establish a dotted line of steps to reach short-, medium- and long-term goals.
  6. Make sure your dotted lines look like one line and not a spider’s web of tangles.
  7. Decide how much personal investment you are willing to give—now and in the future.
  8. Determine your life/work balance and make conscious effort to maintain it.
  9. Revisit your vision and plan for business every three months. Adjust to fit.  Warto raz na 3 miesiące zrewidować swoje wizje i strategie
  10. Have a safety net and a Plan B for every potential obstacle you meet.

‹ Prev    1-5 of 5    Next ›