Charles (Chuck) Eesley 

Assistant Professor, Stanford University, Dept. of Management Science & Engineering (MS&E)

Official Stanford page
 Academic CV

I am an Assistant Professor at Stanford University in the Department of Management Science and Engineering (MS&E). My research and teaching interests focus on strategy and technology entrepreneurship.  In the broadest sense, I am interested in the "ideas sector" of the economy. I want to find out which individual attributes, strategies and institutional arrangements optimally drive the rate of innovation, high growth entrepreneurship, and ultimately economic growth. 

In particular, my research focuses on the determinants of high-growth, innovative firm creation across institutional contexts. I examine the role of two different but critical factors in shaping entrepreneurial outcomes: individual level career history and the institutional context. My work spans two outcomes in particular: individual decisions to choose high-tech entrepreneurial activities and the strategies and outcomes of the entrepreneurial firms that are established. I received the 2010 Best Dissertation Award in the Business Policy and Strategy Division of the Academy of Management and am recipient of the 2007 Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation’s Dissertation Fellowship award. My work has been generously funded by Sequoia Capital, the Kauffman Foundation, the MIT Entrepreneurship Center and Stanford Technology Ventures Program (STVP).

Prior to returning to school, I worked as a research assistant at the Duke University Medical Center, publishing in medical journals and textbooks on cognition in schizophrenia and fMRI neuro-imaging studies. 

Education
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2005-2009
Ph.D., Behavioral and Policy Sciences Technological Innovation and Entrepreneurship (June 2009)

Duke University, 1998-2002 Durham, North Carolina
B.S., Major: Biological Basis of Behavior (Individualized)
School for International Training - Fall 2000 Study Abroad. North India.

Awards and Honors
  • Winner, National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 2012 Research Fund for International Young Scientists
  • Lillie Award, Research grant. Stanford University, 2011.
  • Winner, 2010 Best Dissertation Award in the Business Policy and Strategy Division (BPS) at the Academy of Management.
  • Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation Dissertation Fellowship Award in 2007
  • The Best Student Paper award from the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics in 2008
  • Batten Institute Fellowship, 2010 (University of Virginia, Darden School of Business)
  • MIT Sloan School of Management 
  • Fellowship, J.B. Duke Fellowship
  • Academy of Management Conference Best Paper Proceedings (include only the top 10% of presented papers), 2005-2006, 2010
  • 1st Prize: Duke Startup Challenge
Research Interests
Strategy, Entrepreneurship, Technology Strategy, High Tech Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies

Working Papers

Who has 'The Right Stuff'? Educational Elites, Entrepreneurship and Institutional Change in China. (Appendix). R&R.

Abstract: Our understanding of the connection between institutions and entrepreneurship is limited. Through their impact on barriers to entry and to growth in entrepreneurship, institutions will influence the types of individuals (specifically their level of human and social capital) who choose to engage in entrepreneurial activities. This paper shows that when barriers to the growth of entrepreneurial firms are reduced, elite individuals with higher social and human capital become entrepreneurs. By exploiting a natural experiment – embodied in the 1999 Chinese constitutional amendment – it is possible to implement a differences-in-differences approach to analyze the causal impact of institutional change on entrepreneurship. Unique data were collected through survey responses from 2,966 alumni who graduated from a leading technical university in China between 1947 and 2007. The results show that the greatest increase in the transition to entrepreneurship was generated by elite individuals (those belonging to the top quartiles of a human and social capital distribution).


Eesley, Charles E.; Yang, Delin. Changing Entrepreneurial Strategies to Developing Capitalist Institutions: A Look at Chinese Technology Entrepreneurs.

Abstract: Our understanding of institutional change and strategy is limited. Institutions will influence the types of strategies that result in higher performance in entrepreneurial firms. This paper shows that different strategies and firm characteristics will explain variation in performance as institutional change occurs. Exploiting variation in the institutional environment over time and across regions in China, this paper examines the impact of institutional change on the effectiveness of firm strategies. Unique data were collected through survey responses from alumni who graduated from a Chinese university. The results show that different factors determine firm performance during different stages of institutional reform. These factors differ from those identified in the literature using data from well-developed economy contexts. The results indicate a significantly strong role for entrepreneur-government connections in the less developed institutional environment and a shift towards factors associated with competition in the market.

Eesley, Charles E.; Hsu, David; Roberts, Edward B. Focus or Diversify? Aligning Founding Teams with Strategy and Environment. (under review) [slides here]

Abstract: We examine how innovation strategy and commercialization environment impact the performance of varying configurations of founding teams. While prior work on the characteristics of top management teams has typically found that diverse teams are more highly performing, we advance a view of founding team alignment with new venture strategy and environment. Using unique data from a novel survey of 2,067 firms founded over five decades, we show the conditions within which technology-focused versus diverse founding teams outperform. Our contribution is identifying the performance implications of founding team alignment with concrete strategies – i.e., innovation v. imitation, and competition v. cooperation. Strategy and environment significantly influence optimal founding team composition. These results cast doubt on predictions of the life-cycle perspective that ventures can professionalize over time to fit their strategy.

Armanios, Daniel; Eesley, Charles E.; Li, Jizhen; Eisenhardt, K. Network or Science Parks?: How Ventures Acquire Government Resources to Innovate in Emerging Economies.

Abstract: We know ventures in developed countries acquire resources either through networks or institutions. However, economic transitions inside emerging economies lead networks and institutions to interact in unclear ways. Therefore, how ventures in emerging economies navigate this interplay between networks and institutions to acquire resources and what are the performance implications of such processes remains unclear. We propose ventures acquire resources through two equally possible two-step pathways. If ventures have personal ties to important network contacts, we argue venture resource acquisition is bottom-up where the direct relationship a venture has with the contact facilitates an indirect relationship between the venture and the resource-holding institution the contact represents. If ventures do not have personal ties, we argue venture resource acquisition is top-down where government-supported institutions (GSI), such as science parks, serve as network intermediaries between the venture and the external institution holding the desired resource. Because entrepreneurs acquire resources only if both steps in each two-step process are successfully completed, we argue the capture of the desired resource entirely mediates the relationship between the venture and the venture’s performance. Using a novel quasi-experimental treatment-control research design generating a matched sample of 94 science park and non-science park ventures in Beijing’s Haidian District, we find support for our assertions.

Eesley, Charles E.; Hsu, David; Roberts, Edward B. Bringing Entrepreneurial Ideas to Life. (under review)

AbstractOrganizational design in the context of new venture development is particularly challenging due to initially severe resource constraints. Deepening our understanding of differential productivity in the startup resource assembly process is therefore important. We address the twin questions of what assets are important to venture performance, and under what conditions are those assets especially important? We do so by considering initial venture idea assets and founder contracting experience. The resource-based view of the firm stresses developing the right assets, which accords with idea assets. Firm boundary theories of the firm emphasize structuring relationships in the right way given a set of organizational assets, which accords with founder contracting experience. Using unique survey data, we find that neither view by itself is as important as both theories taken together. We therefore advance an integrated perspective by showing that new ventures perform better when they both identify valuable resources and also assemble human assets with expertise in structuring organizational arrangements to commercialize those ideas. An important implication is that organizational resources have a range of potential values, and that realizing the upper range of value capture involves the additional ability to structure organizational relationships.

Eesley, Charles E. Entrepreneurial Ventures from Technology-Based Universities: A Cross-National Comparison 

Abstract: We compare U.S. (MIT alumni) and Chinese (Tsinghua Univ. alumni) founders and their entrepreneurial outcomes. We find that much is similar in terms of the characteristics of entrepreneurs and the start-up process factors between the MIT and Tsinghua alumni. Nonetheless, there are some relatively subtle differences that in combination with the differences in the environment for entrepreneurial firms and the institutional history of China have led to vastly different outcomes for the entrepreneurial firms from MIT and Tsinghua. The shorter time frame in which entrepreneurial activity has been occurring in China resulted in a younger, smaller set of entrepreneurial firms. Similarly, the younger age of Tsinghua entrepreneurs contributes to a different mix of idea and team sources (fewer from work experience) that might also partially explain the differences in firm outcomes. The mix of funding sources and proportions of firms relying on technological innovation are strikingly similar. While firm size in terms of employees is roughly similar, the MIT firms are much larger in terms of revenues than the Tsinghua firms. It is clear that the broader environment exerts a strong impact on the outcomes of entrepreneurs, their processes, and their firm outcomes.

Eesley, Charles E.; Jamber Li; Delin Yang. Does public funding of university R&D influence high-tech entrepreneurship?: Evidence from China’s Project 985

Abstract: In contrast to the long line of literature on venture capital or liquidity constraints and innovation, the relationship between public R&D expenditures and innovation in entrepreneurial firms has not been systematically scrutinized. We address this gap in our understanding using data from China, where expenditures in the public sector on R&D have increased significantly. We exploit Project 985, which gave significant additional research funding to certain universities in China and not others. Using a differences-in-differences methodology, we seek to isolate the causal impact of this additional funding on the career and entrepreneurship decisions of the alumni. We also seek to understand whether this additional basic R&D funding resulted in a change in the quality of the ventures created by alumni.

Eberhart, Robert N.; Eesley, Charles E.; Eisenhardt, K. Failure IS an Option: Institutional Barriers to Failure and New Firm Performance.

Abstract
Do bankruptcy changes in the institutional environment affect the rate of founding by particular types of founders and the performance of their ventures? We take advantage of a natural experiment in Japan where during the last decade Japan implemented legal reforms to revive Japan’s economic fortunes by changes to bankruptcy laws that reduced the consequences of closing a firm. We argue that lowered costs of exit may have attracted individuals with greater human capital and social networks thus positively affecting new firm performance. We argue and test whether making it easier to fail will attract more founders and higher human capital founders resulting in improved firm performance. Our findings are: as expected the bankruptcy rate increases but at a higher rate for high human capital individuals, the rate of startup firms increases for older and elite educated entrepreneurs, and these groups of entrepreneurs are more likely to found higher performing firms. Overall, while prior research emphasizes the lowering of entry barriers, our work shows that reducing the costs of failure can also stimulate venture formation among certain groups, and lead to forming higher performing firms.


Abstract: Despite increasing attention to the relationship between institutions and entrepreneurship, there has been limited research about the link between institutional flexibility and entrepreneurial behavior. This paper explores a constraint on flexibility – the academic year system – by exploiting Tsinghua University’s 1984 adoption of the more flexible credit system as a natural experiment. Using a differences-in-differences approach and controlling for changes in the economy, we find that a shift from rigid to a more flexible institution increases entrepreneurial behavior. Furthermore, flexibility increases entrepreneurship most sharply for individuals who did not perform well in the more rigid academic system (those with lower GPAs in this case). The results speak to the literature on institutional constraints on entrepreneurship while extending previous research by offering a credibly exogenous source of variation in the institutional environment.

Eesley, Charles E. Entrepreneurship and China: History of Policy Reforms and Institutional Development.

Eesley, Charles E. Institutions and Innovation: A Literature Review of the Impact of Public R&D and Financial Institutions on Firm Innovation.

Eesley, Charles; Lenox, Michael. Secondary Stakeholder Actions and the Selection of Firm Targets. (R&R) Also
Best Paper Proceedings of the 2006 Academy of Management Conference (include only the top 10% of presented papers)

Abstract: In this paper, we advance the stakeholder theory literature by developing and testing a set of hypotheses concerning which firms are likely to be targeted by secondary stakeholder groups. To test these hypotheses, we draw upon a unique dataset of stakeholder actions within the United States concerning environmental issues over the period 1988 to 2003. We find evidence for two clusters of stakeholder groups, each using different tactics and targeting different populations of firms. In general, we find firms that are more consumer-oriented, financially sound, and heavier polluters are more likely to be targets of environmentally-oriented stakeholder actions.

Eesley, Charles E. Alumni Surveys as a Data Collection Methodology.


Publications

Eesley, Charles E. Are You Experienced: When Does Talent vs. Experience Drive Entrepreneurial Performance (with Edward B. Roberts), forthcoming, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. (Winner, Best Paper Proceedings Award, AOM conference, Montreal, 2010.) [slides here]

Abstract: In this paper, we explore the conditions when entrepreneurial experience or skill drives the performance of new ventures. We use novel data from a survey of 2,111 entrepreneurs where we have detailed data on their entire career of founding attempts allowing us to control time-invariant individual effects. Our findings show that both entrepreneurial experience and selection on skill matter. When the current market or technology is more similar to the past, then entrepreneurial experience is more important. This reverses and underlying entrepreneurial skill becomes a stronger factor than experience when the industry is changing, undergoes a disruption or when the firm’s technology is more innovative. These findings contribute to our understanding of congenital learning and the recent work on how previous industry experience influences new venture performance.

Hsu, David; Roberts, E.B.; Eesley, Charles. Entrepreneurs from Technology-Based Universities: Evidence from MIT. Research Policy 36 (2007) 768–788.

Eesley, Charles; Lenox, Michael. 2006. Firm Responses to Secondary Stakeholder Action. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8):765-781.

Lenox, M. and Eesley, C. 2009. Private Environmental Activism and the Selection and Response of Firm Targets. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(1), 45-73.

Edward B. Roberts and Charles E. Eesley (2011) "Entrepreneurial Impact: The Role of MIT - An Updated Report", Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship: Vol. 7: No 1-2, pp 1-149.

Edward B. Roberts and Charles E. Eesley. (2009) "Entrepreneurial Impact: The Role of MIT", Kauffman Foundation. Available at http://www.kauffman.org/newsroom/mit-entrepreneurs.aspx

Eesley, Charles E. and Douglas Hannah. 2011. Review of: Winds of Change: The Environmental Movement and the Global Development of the Wind Energy Industry. By Ion B. Vasi. Administrative Science Quarterly.

Conferences and Presentations

Eesley, Charles E.; Hsu, David; Roberts, Edward B. Focus or Diversify? Aligning Founding Teams with Strategy and Environment. Copenhagen Business School, Dec. 20th, 2011. [slides here]

The Impact of Alumni Entrepreneurship: Evidence from MIT and Tsinghua University. National University of Singapore (NUS). June 21st, 2011.

Enabling Factors for Successful University Spin-Offs. National University of Singapore (NUS). June 20th, 2011.

The Future of Technology Entrepreneurship Research. Invited presentation at MIT's TIES group 50th anniversary. April 1st, 2011.

Entrepreneurial Performance in a Developing Economy: Evidence from China

Bringing Entrepreneurial Ideas to Life (with David Hsu and Edward B. Roberts)

  • London Business School Ghoshal Strategy Conference, London, May 15-16th, 2010
  • SIEPR Seminar, Stanford University, Sept. 23rd, 2009
  • Organization Science Winter Conference. Steamboat Springs, CO, Feb. 4-7th, 2010
  • BYU-Utah Winter Strategy Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, Feb. 25-27th, 2010

Who has 'The Right Stuff'? Human Capital, Entrepreneurship and Institutional Change in China.

  • Carnegie Mellon University, SETChange Seminar. Nov. 10th, 2011
  • Duke University, Fuqua School of Business, Durham, NC. Nov. 2nd, 2011
  • Academy of International Business (AIB), Nagoya, Japan, June 27th, 2011
  • Rice University Conference on Strategy in Emerging Markets, April 30th, 2010
  • World Bank - Entrepreneurship and Growth Conference. Washington, DC. Nov. 19-20th, 2009
  • Stanford University Graduate School of Business, Organizational Behavior seminar, Nov. 4th, 2009
  • Washington University, Oct. 7, 2009
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Productivity Lunch, Fall, 2008
  • Annual CCC Doctoral Colloquium. Carnegie Mellon. April 11-13th, 2008
  • SASE Student Paper Award, Costa Rica, June, 2008.
  • Babson Conference on Entrepreneurship Research (BCERC), June, 2008
  • Duke Univ. Fuqua School of Business, Jan. 2008
  • MIT Political Econ Breakfast; Development Lunch, Fall, 2008
  • MIT Finance Lunch, Fall, 2008
  • Georgia Tech Roundtable on Engineering and Entrepreneurship Research. Atlanta, GA. Nov. 2007

What Should Drive an Innovation Strategy? (with Edward B. Roberts and Delin Yang)

  • Strategic Management Society. Washington DC. Oct. 13th, 2009

Cutting Your Teeth (with Edward B. Roberts)

  • Organization Science Winter Conference. Steamboat Springs, CO, Feb. 4-7th, 2010.
  • West Coast Research Symposium (WCRS) University of Washington. Seattle, WA. Sept. 10-12th, 2009 
  • Academy of Management Annual Meeting. Atlanta, GA. Aug. 11-16th, 2006. 
  • MIT Economics Department Theory Group, June, 2006.

Eesley, Charles & Lenox, Michael. Secondary Stakeholder Actions and the Selection of Firm Targets. Academy of Management Annual Meeting. Atlanta, GA. Aug. 11-16th, 2006. Conference Best Paper Proceedings (include only the top 10% of presented papers)

Eesley, Charles & Michael Lenox.Secondary Stakeholder Actions and the Selection of Firm Targets.Institutional Mechanisms of Industry Self-Regulation Conference.Dartmouth, Feb. 24-25th, 2006.

MIT Innovation and Entrepreneurship Seminar Series. Entrepreneurs from Technology-Based Universities: An Empirical First Look (co-presenter with Ed Roberts). Cambridge, MA. September 12, 2005.

Eesley,Charles; Lenox, Michael. Secondary Stakeholders and Firm Self-Regulation. Academy of Management Conference Best Paper Proceedings (include only the top 10% of presented papers), Honolulu, Hawaii. August 9, 2005.

Teaching Experience

Stanford University E145 - Technology Entrepreneurship

Stanford University MSE 372 - Entrepreneurial Firms, Strategy and Innovation, PhD seminar

MIT Sloan School of Management 15.024 - Applied Economics for Managers, Sloan Fellows class - Teaching Assistant for Thomas Stoker, Summer 2009.

MIT Sloan School of Management 15.354 - Innovation and Entrepreneurship: How to do it, Undergraduate class - Teaching Assistant for James M. Utterback, David J. McGrath Jr. Professor of Management of Innovation, Professor of Engineering Systems Spring 2008.

MIT Sloan School of Management 15.350 - Managing Technological Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Sloan Fellows class - Teaching Assistant for Edward B. Roberts David Sarnoff Professor of the Management of Technology; Chair, MIT Entrepreneurship Center Fall 2007.

Professional and Service Activities

  • Presentation for the US - China Innovation Experts Group, SIEPR, Stanford University, March 17, 2011
  • University Chair, Dissertation Defense of Nathan Bronson, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, May 10, 2010
  • Presentation for a meeting hosted by Dean Jim Plummer and Laura Breyfogle for a delegation from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill associated with their entrepreneurship efforts.
  • Presentation for the Stanford Engineering Venture Fund, Winter, 2010
  • Co-organizer, Stanford SIEPR social science and technology seminar
  • Co-organizer, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Entrepreneurship Research Bootcamp, July 2009, (with Josh Lerner and Thomas Hellmann)
  • Co-organizer, MIT Sloan Innovation and Entrepreneurship Seminar, 2007-08
  • Reviewer, Organization Science, Strategic Management Journal, Academy of Management Annual Meeting Entrepreneurship and Technology and Innovation Management (TIM) Divisions
  • Academy of Management Conference Best Paper Proceedings (include only the top 10% of presented papers), 2005, 2006.

  • Additional Publications from Prior Experience

    Keefe, Richard; Eesley, Charles. 2012. Neurocognitive Impairments. in Lieberman, Stroup, Perkins, eds., Essentials of Schizophrenia. American Psychiatric Publishing. Washington, DC.

    Keefe, Richard; Eesley, Charles. 2009. Neurocognition in Schizophrenia. in Kaplan and Sadock's Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, Benjamin Sadock, M.D., Virginia A. Sadock, M.D., and Pedro Ruiz, M.D. Editors. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins.

    ·Sloan, Frank A.; Eesley, Charles. 2007. Implementing a Public Subsidy for Vaccines. in Pharmaceutical Innovation: Incentives, Competition, and Cost-Benefit Analysis in International Perspective. edited by Frank A. Sloan and Chee-Ruey Hsieh. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    ·Sloan, Frank A; Eesley, Charles E. 2006. Governments as Insurers in Professional and Hospital Liability Insurance Markets. In William M. Sage and Rogan Kersh, eds., Medical Malpractice and the U.S. Health Care System--New Century, Different Issues. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    ·Keefe, Richard; Eesley, Charles; Poe, Meg. 2005. Defining A Cognitive Function Decrement in Schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 57:688-691.

    ·Keefe, Richard; Eesley, Charles. Neurocognitive Impairments. in American Psychiatry Publishing Textbook of Schizophrenia. Edited by Jeffrey A. Lieberman, M.D., T. Scott Stroup, M.D., and Diana O. Perkins, M.D. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. 2005.

    Industry Experience

  • Founder/CEO, Lobby 10 Consulting (Life sciences) 2007-2009
  • Consultant, Flagship Ventures 2007-2009
  • Analyst, Lux Capital Management 2006-2007
  • Mentor, MIT 100K Competition - Hemetrics, 2006-2007
  • Mentor, MIT Enterprise Forum Ignite Clean Energy Challenge - Fox2 Technologies, 2007; Sequesco, 2008; Hydrophen, Finalist, 2006.
  • Learning Friends, Co-Founder/CFO, Educational software: Woodside, CA - Oct. 2005 - current.
  • Sun Dance Genetics, corn biotech: Durham, NC - 2001 - 2002.
    http://images.businessweek.com/ss/07/05/0531_grad_winners/index_01.htm
    http://localtechwire.com/business/local_tech_wire/biotech/story/1149000/
    http://www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/apr2003/sb20030422_9661_PG2_sb020.htm
    http://dukechronicle.com/node/127240
    http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fsb/fsb_archive/2003/02/01/336859/index.htm
    Including a video: http://www.dukestartupchallenge.com/history/2001-2002
  • NeuroCog Trials, Inc., Neurocognitive training / Pharmaceutical trials: Chapel Hill, NC - 2002 - 2006.
  • The Carlyle Group - Co-lead on due diligence project in the mobile telecommunications space. Summer 2006.
  • NeuroCog Trials, Inc.: Consultant 2002-2005. Consulted on clinical trials research design and implementation - Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, GSK, Saegis - Chapel Hill, NC.

  • Additional Information

    • Outside interests include: hiking, biking, reading, Duke basketball, jogging, swimming, cooking, wine, travel, and tennis.

    Locations of visitors to this page

    Copyright (c) Chuck Eesley

    Sign in  |  Recent Site Activity  |  Terms  |  Report Abuse  |  Print page  |  Powered by Google Sites