Here is an article to read about the canes that were made commemorating the Chatsworth Train Wreck. They are thought to have been made by a fireman who was at the wreck.
They cite an article from the Bloomington Pantagraph in 1936 that stated that a B.J. Judd of Colfax, survivor of the wreck, was in possession of one of these canes.
This info is from: http://canequest.com/unique_relic.asp .
Relic Canes One of the attractions to collecting antique canes and walking sticks is certainly tied to an aesthetic appreciation of the careful, fine craftsmanship and artistry applied to a wide variety of beautiful, and often precious, materials. But the greater attraction for me has always been that fragile connection that exists between the object in hand and a distant, dimly perceived time; a time peopled with folk whose daily existence was so very different from our own, yet, at the same time, laid the foundation for who we have become. Because of this, I am drawn to presentation canes, canes carrying inscriptions of dates or names that can be researched, and perhaps represent an interesting story that can be uncovered with a bit of digging. The most striking example of such a stick, the type that resonates with the most tangible connection to time removed and events overlooked, is the relic cane. A relic cane is one crafted from materials that boast an actual physical connection to the event it has been created to commemorate. A few examples of relic canes that I have seen and handled at auction, or read as described in catalogues, are canes whose shafts are reputed to have been made from timber salvaged from the U.S.S. Constitution ("Old Ironsides") during one of its overhauls; a cane whose handle was fashioned from a small piece cut from the end of a spool that been part of the laying of the first Transatlantic cable; and, in a more macabre vein, a keepsake stick whose handle is carved from a section of the femur bone of an amputee casualty of the battle at Bull Run. Not long ago, I was lucky enough to make such a stick a prized piece in my own collection. This cane is fashioned with a smooth, turned shaft of dark walnut, about 32" long and topped with a substantial brass fitting, which, in turn, is topped with a three inch teardrop shaped wooden knob matching the shaft. The following inscription is found carefully and neatly incised into the uppermost eight inches of the shaft- T.P. & W. R.R. WRECK 81 KILLED From a local newspaper account contemporary to the tragedy-
The story accompanying the cane when I purchased it was that it had belonged to the estate of a local woman who had owned the relic for as long as her descendants could remember. How she had, herself, originally acquired the stick remained unclear, but the story that had been passed down in the family was that the cane was the creation of a man who had been a fireman among the first party of rescuers to arrive at the scene of the wreck. He had been so moved, it is said, by the scene to which he bore witness, that he felt compelled to create some object in order to forever commemorate the terrible event. The cane is reputed to be crafted from decorative fittings and wood salvaged from the shattered trappings of one of the train's luxury coaches. In fact, a minimum of four, and possibly more, such souvenir canes were made. I know this because I was intrigued enough by the story to embark on a research journey of my own. One thing I turned up was an article in a 1936 issue of a Bloomington, Illinois newspaper, The Daily Pantagraph, commemorating the 49th anniversary of the Chatsworth Railroad Disaster. The article prominently featured a photograph of a man holding a walking stick that was captioned,
The cane being held in the photo is similar to the stick I purchased, but it is not the same cane. In googling 'Chatsworth Train Wreck', I was led to chat sites peopled by enthusiasts of the role of railroading in our national heritage. One railroad hobbyist and earnest historian of local histories had been so intrigued by the controversy surrounding the Chatsworth event that he sold his suburban Chicago home and took up residence in the stately two-story Chatsworth home that had served as the emergency makeshift infirmary/morgue for victims of the 1887 disaster. He spent several years prior to his move in collaboration with a local Chatsworth mentor and historian in her own right who had gathered a tremendous collection of artifacts and documents pertaining to the rail tragedy. Fortunately for me, this gentleman was gracious enough, when he discovered my interest, to invite me down to view what had become his collection. Since Chatsworth is only a four-hour drive from my home (and a mere 30 minutes from where one of my sons is attending college) a "road trip" was definitely in order. My host began by relating, for me and my husband, the story of the controversy surrounding the true cause of the horrible accident involving the 1887 T.P. & W. Niagara Falls excursion train. His own interest in the wreck pertains most specifically to clearing the name of the individual, Timothy Coughlin, blamed by most popular historical accounts for the genesis of the accident. It seems Coughlin was a section crew chief working for the T.P. & W. whose crew, the week of the wreck, had been assigned the task of burning away brush in the railroad right-of-way in the general area of the site of the wreck. Contemporary newspaper accounts of the "facts" surrounding the wreck tell that the disaster occurred when the train approached a shallow trestled ravine. The trestle was burning, but when the engineer in the lead engine came close enough to detect the fire, it was already too late to stop the train. The lead and second engine plunged into the ravine when the burning trestle collapsed. The tender and passenger coaches followed, one car collapsing into another as the bodies inside were thrown and crushed. According Our host then showed us many of the artifacts of the wreck that he had acquired. Among these were two souvenir walking sticks. These canes were similar to mine and the style of the lettering of the inscriptions on their shafts left no doubt that they were created by the same hand that had made mine. Again, however, the sticks were not the same as the one appearing in the 1936 Pantagraph photo. There is really no way to determine, now, either how many of these sticks were originally fashioned, or how many may still survive tucked away in trunks stowed in attics or cellars. As a final gesture, our new friend took us out to the actual site of the Chatsworth train wreck. The trestle has since been replaced by a concrete culvert, but the ravine and surrounding bean fields must appear much as they did at the time of the wreck in 1887. He pointed out which direction the train had been coming from, how it must have gained momentum on the downward grade approaching the ravine trestle, where the first engine struck the side of the ravine after the trestle had collapsed, followed by the tender and the first few passenger coaches containing the unfortunate victims, and finally how and where each of the subsequent coaches fell and landed. As I stood in the field, listening to my guide, I felt a real connection to the survivors like B.M. Judd, the firemen (one of them, perhaps, the maker of my cane) who had rushed to the site to aid the injured and drag out the dead, the defamed Timothy Coughlin and his crew, and even the crowds of townspeople who flocked to the site just to gawk at the bodies and smoldering wreckage. That connection continues to live on in the wood and brass of the relic cane that had started me on this journey into history.
|



