NEWSLETTER

In this newsletter many of the articles are concerned with the use of assessment data and the extent to which it should be shared.  At our November 15th Assessment Planning Committee meeting, Sally Frazee will share results from Temple's New Student Questionnaire and Temple University's Student Questionnaire for the committee to consider.


Best Practice at Temple

Schools and Colleges are taking different approaches to posting student learning goals on their websites to good effect:  click here to see some examples.


Assessment News from Temple

Assessment Is No Joke | From the Bell Tower

By Steven Bell, Associate University Librarian, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA

Library Journal, 11/12/2009



Testing at Temple

From the Office of Measurement and Research:

Temple University uses a series of nationally and locally constructed surveys and questionnaires to measure students' experiences, perceptions, and engagement with the university. New students to the university complete the New Student Questionnaire. Each year, continuing students complete a campus climate and experiences survey. In alternating years, students complete either the NSSE or the Temple Student Questionnaire.

 
NSQ:Temple's New Student Questionnaire (NSQ) is administered to all freshmen and transfer students who take the university's Placement Examination. Nearly all freshmen and approximately one quarter of transfer students complete the NSQ. The results of the questionnaire are used to monitor trends in student characteristics, attitudes, intentions, and aspirations.
NSSE:

The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from samples of first-year and senior students about the nature and quality of their undergraduate experience. Five "benchmarks" of effective educational practice are reported: Level of Academic Challenge, Active and Collaborative Learning, Student-Faculty Interaction, Enriching Educational Experiences, and Supportive Campus Environment.

Temple most recently participated in the Spring 2005, 2007, and 2009 NSSE administrations.  The NSSE is administered via the web, and students receive all contacts electronically and complete the survey online.  The overall response rate for the Spring 2009 administration was 28%.

TSQ:

The Temple Student Questionnaire (TSQ) is administered to matriculated undergraduates. The TSQ was developed to serve four major purposes:

  • to obtain students' perceptions of Temple's academic, social, and administrative programs
  • to gather information about students' participation in various university and non-university activities
  • to monitor change in students' attitudes, activities, and needs over time
  • to provide data for assessing factors related to students' success

Most recently, Temple administered the TSQ in the Spring of 2010.  The TSQ is administered via the web, and students receive all contacts electronically and complete the survey online.



Assessment in GenEd at Temple

Visit the GenEd assessment website:

In the News:  Using Data

The following article in the Chronicle explores the ways colleges collect assessment and yet hesitate to use it.  The NSSE and the VSA are mentioned.

It's Not How Much Student Data You Have, but How You Use It

By Sara Lipka

November 4, 2010


You may want to take a look at the following NSSE publication, that was referenced in the article above, in which you will find descriptions of the use of NSSE data at colleges and universities.

Using NSSE to Assess and Improve Undergraduate Education: Lessons from the Field 2009



The following article by Linda Suskie is a reflection on assessment and its potential worth.  "So before we start another assessment cycle, we need to sit back and reflect, starting with my favorite assessment question, “Why?” Why are we assessing this particular goal and not others? Why do we think this particular goal is so important? Why did we choose this particular assessment strategy? How has it been helpful? And has its value been in proportion to the time and money we’ve spent on it?"

Why Are We Assessing?

  • By Linda Suskie
  • October 26, 2010



The following article describes an initiative of the New Leadership Alliance that focuses on publishing assessment results and using assessment results.  It is being supported by 71 college and university presidents.

'Collective Action' on Assessing Learning

  • November 5, 2010


Sample of a university and its president's public commitment posted on the New Leadership Alliance website:


Indiana State University

President:Daniel J. Bradley
Liaison Name:Ed

Kinley

Liaison Title:Associate Vice President, Academic Affairs + CIO
Liaison Phone:(812) 237-2100
Liaison E-mail:ed.kinley@indstate.edu
Accreditor:North Central Association of Colleges and Schools
Type:Four-Year
Governance:Public
Size:Large (more than 10,000)

PRESIDENTIAL COMMITMENTS

Current
Initiative
2010-2012
Initiatives
1. Improving the gathering of evidence about student learning outcomes by (for example):
a. Ensuring that your institution collects data on its entire set of common student learning outcomes and how well these are achieved.Yes
b. Participating in one or more nationally benchmarked data collection processes (examination, portfolio, or survey) and publicly reporting the results, including disaggregated evidence (by race, sex, etc.).Yes
c. Developing, discussing, and publicizing a campus wide audit of evidence of student learning and student participation in high impact practices for your institution.YesYes
d. Other
Description of Institutional Initiatives: Download
Current2010-2012
2. Expanding the use of evidence on student learning outcomes to improve programs and practices by (for example):
a. Making the analysis, use, and reporting of evidence of student learning outcomes a prominent and influential factor in the institution’s strategic planning or program review process.YesYes
b. Documenting and publicizing significant changes and demonstrable improvements in the quality of academic programs, co-curricular programs, and support services as a result of student learning outcomes assessment.Yes
c. Other
Description of Institutional Initiatives Download
Current2010-2012
3. Expanding the reporting on student learning outcomes on- and off-campus to ensure transparency and accountability by (for example):
a. Developing or improving mechanisms through which student learning outcomes assessment results are shared with faculty, staff, administrators, and students, including opportunities for these groups to meet and review results.YesYes
b. Ensuring that at least once a year the governing board of your institution receives and discusses a report about your efforts to assess student learning outcomes and to use that evidence to improve the quality of academic programs, co-curricular programs, and support services.YesYes
c. Establishing on your institution's website a highly visible and easily accessible location where assessments of student learning and their uses are made public.YesYes
d. Other
Description of Institutional Initiatives: Download
Current2010-2012
4. Expanding the noteworthy work on your own campus to other institutions by (for example):
a. Serving as a resource for other institutions or professional groups who would use your campus as a model for ways to strengthen assessing, reporting on, and improving student learning outcomes.Yes
b. Joining with other members of the Presidents’ Alliance at national conferences and events to report progress on achieving this agenda.YesYes
c. Other
Description of Institutional Initiatives: Download




Excerpt from an article in Inside Higher Ed that captures some of the debate around NSSE and its use.  "For example, he said that one college was getting lower scores than would be desirable for NSSE’s measures of academic challenge, and that those lower scores also resulted in smaller gains in critical thinking skills. Wabash followed up with in-depth interviews with faculty members, many of whom said that they were holding back on homework out of the fear that their students were working too long hours in jobs to handle the homework. Using answers to other NSSE questions, Blaich said he was able to show the faculty members that they were overestimating the hours students at this college were working, and so could add assignments. They did so, and appear to be getting the desired gains, he said."  See the link to the article below:

Assessment Tip and List of Resources

Three Questions for Evaluating Teaching by Barbara Walvoord in Assessment Clear and Simple

Three Basic Questions for Evaluating Teaching Instruments of Evaluation
 Are the learning objectives of the course being met?  Are students being inspired and motivated to think analytically and creatively and to develop habits of mind appropriate to the discipline

  • Measures of student learning based on students' in-course papers, projects, or exams evaluated by the faculty member's explicit standards and criteria
  • Student' performance on standardized tests
  • Student's performance in subsequent courses
 Are the course material, concepts, and activities rigorous, current, relevant for students' needs, and consonant with the announced course description?

  •  Colleague examination of course syllabus, exams, and other material
  • [Review from panel of external experts actively working in the  field.*]
 Do students perceive themselves to be well taught?
  • Student course evaluations, surveys, focus groups
  • Alumni surveys

*Added to Walvoord's original list


Resources

Articles and Reports

Assessment References

Allen, Mary J., Assessing Academic Programs in Higher Education, Anker Publishing Company, Inc., 2004

Allen, Mary J., Assessing General Education Programs, Anker Publishing Company, Inc., 2006

Anderson, Lorin W. and Krathwohl, David R. (Eds.) with Airasian, Peter W., Cruikshank, Kathleen A., Mayer, Richard E., Pintrich, Paul R., Raths, James, and Wittrock, Merlin C., A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. 2001.

Bain, Ken, What the Best College Teachers Do, Harvard University Press, 2004

Banta, Trudy W., Lund, Jon P., Black, Karen E. and Oblander, Frances W., Assessment in Practice: putting principles to work on college campuses by Jossey-Bass, 1996

Banta, Trudy W. and Associates (editors), Building a Scholarship of Assessment, Jossey-Bass, John Wiley & Sons, 2002

Bloom, Benjamin S. (Ed.), Englehart, Max D., Furst, Edward J., Hill, Walker H., and Krathwohl, David R.,Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, David McKay Company, Inc. New York, 1954, 1956.

Bransford, John D., Brown, Ann L., and Cocking, Rodney R. (editors), How People Learn; National Research Council Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning; National Academy Press, 1999

Bresciani, Marilee J., Zelna, Carrie L. and Anderson, James A., Assessing Student Learning and Development: A Handbook for Practitioners, National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (NASPA), 2004

Brown, George, Bull, Joanna, and Pendlebury, Malcolm, Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education, Routledge, New York, 1997

Diamond, Robert M., Designing and Assessing Courses & Curricula, Jossey-Bass Inc., 1998

Eder, Douglas J., “General Education Assessment Within the Disciplines”, The Journal of General Education, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 135-157, 2004.

Erwin, T. Dary, Assessing Student Learning and Development: A Guide to the Principles, Goals, and Methods of Determining College Outcomes, Jossey-Bass Inc., 1991

Fulks, Janet, “Assessing Student Learning in Community Colleges”, Bakersfield College, 2004 obtained at http://online.bakersfieldcollege.edu/courseassessment/Default.htm

Harrow, Anita J., A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain: a guide for developing behavioral objectives, David McKay Company, Inc., 1972

Hernon, Peter and Dugan, Robert E. (Editors), Outcomes Assessment in Higher Education: Views and Perspectives, Libraries Unlimited, A Member of the Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc., 2004

Heywood, John, Assessment in Higher Education, Jessica Kingsley Publishers Ltd, London, 2000

Huba, Mary E. and Freed, Jann E., Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: shifting the focus from teaching to learning, Allyn & Bacon, 2000

Kirkpatrick, Donald L., Evaluating Training Programs: the four levels, 2nd edition, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., 1998

Krathwohl, David R., Bloom, Benjamin S., and Masia, Bertram B., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook II: Affective Domain, Longman Inc., 1964

Mager, Robert F., Preparing Instructional Objectives, Fearon Publishers 1962

Mager, Robert F., Preparing Instructional Objectives: A critical tool in the development of effective instruction 3rd edition, The Center for Effective Performance, Inc. 1997

Maki, Peggy L., Assessing for Learning: Building a sustainable commitment across the institution, Stylus Publishing, LLC, American Association for Higher Education, 2004

Nichols, James O. and Nichols, Karen W., A Road Map for Improvement of Student Learning and Support Services Through Assessment, Agathon Press, 2005

Pagano, Neil, “Defining Outcomes for Programs and Courses”, June 2005 Higher Learning Commission Workshop Making a Difference in Student Learning: Assessment as a Core Strategy, available at http://www.ncahigherlearningcommission.org/download/Pagano_DefiningOutcomes.pdf

Palomba, Catherine A. and Banta, Trudy W., Assessment Essentials: planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education, Jossey-Bass, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1999

Pellegrino, James W. , Chudowsky, Naomi and Glaser, Robert (editors); Knowing What Students Know: The science and design of educational assessment, Committee on the Foundations of Assessment, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, National Academy Press, 2001

Prus, Joseph and Johnson, Reid, “A Critical Review of Student Assessment Options”, in  "Assessment & Testing Myths and Realities" edited by Trudy H. Bers and Mary L. Mittler, New Directions for Community Colleges, Number 88, Winter 1994, pp. 69-83.

Stevens, Dannelle D. and Levi, Antonia J., Introduction to Rubrics: An Assessment Tool to Save Grading Time, Convey Effective Feedback, and Promote Student Learning, Stylus Publishing, 2005

Suskie, Linda, Assessing Student Learning: A common sense guide, Anker Publishing Company, 2004

Tagg, John, The Learning Paradigm College, Anker Publishing Company, Inc., 2003

Terenzini, Patrick T., “Assessment with open eyes: Pitfalls in studying student outcomes.” Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 60, No. 6, pp. 644-664, November/December 1989.

Walvoord, Barbara E. and Anderson, Virginia J., Effective Grading: A Tool for Learning and Assessment, Jossey-Bass, 1998

Walvoord, Barbara E., Assessment Clear and Simple, John Wiley & Sons, 2004

Taken from the University of Connecticut Assessment Website