Writings:

Some new things and things in progress:

• An interview with the Atlanta University Center Library! 
  
• "Teaching African American Philosophy of Religion and the Many Problems of Evil" (LINK HERE)
• A bibliography of sorts on African-American philosophy of religion, esp. theodicy. 
• On March 5, 2010, I created a survey to try to identify which topics are most commonly addressed in introductory ethics courses that have a contemporary moral issues or problems component. If (and only if) you teach a course that focuses on practical issues (with little to no discussion of moral theory) or has a mix of theory and problems (either a unit on theory and then problems or a mix of theory and problems throughout), please fill out this survey below: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/ethics-course-survey
  

  Results have been posted here, since I closed the survey:

  https://sites.google.com/site/nobisphilosophy/ethics-course-survey 

• Rational Animals: Critical Thinking & Animal Ethics

• Why Think That? Reason, Argument and Ethics: A Guide To Making Moral Progress. A short book on logic and critical thinking that focuses on how to think (not what to think) about ethical questions that is geared toward students and scientists, called (see http://www.WhyThinkThat.com). The book is designed to bridge the 'gap' between how philosophers / logicians often think about moral issues -- especially the methods they use -- and how non-philosophers often address moral issues, and address some of common cognitive, emotional and social barriers to using philosophical methods in addressing moral questions.
• This is based on many of these handouts from my intro to ethics class. 
• African-American Philosophy: A Short Analytical Introduction to Philosophy of Race

Dissertation (2005): Truth in Ethics and Epistemology: A Defense of Normative Realism
Articles & Presentations:

• "Abortion, Metaphysics and Morality: A Review of Francis Beckwith’s Defending Life: A Moral and Legal Case Against Abortion Choice," Journal of Medicine and Philosophy (2011)
• "The Harmful, Nontherapeutic Use of Animals in Research Is Morally Wrong," Symposium Article, American Journal of the Medical Sciences, October 2011, Volume 342, Issue 4, pp 297-304 ; Powepoint for Pitts Conference in Medical Ethics, Medical University of South Carolina, lecture on animal experimentation. October 29, 2010. 
  
• "R.M. Hare’s Irrationalist 'Rationalism': A Critic of Universal Prescriptivism," Southwest Philosophy Review (forthcoming)
• Nobis, Nathan and Jarr-Koroma, Abubakarr Sidique (2010) "Abortion and Moral Arguments From Analogy," The American Journal of Bioethics, 10: 12, 59 — 61, First published on: 14 December 2010 
• "Ethical Science, Scientific Ethics and Animal Ethics," Animals, Research and Alternatives conference, Washington, DC, August 2010.
  
• "Moral Progress and Moral Argument Analysis," American Association of Philosophy Teachers 2010 Summer Conference. 
• A critique of arguments in Robert P. George and Christopher Tollefson's Embryo book against embryo experimentation. (Presented at the NC/SC philosophy conference, Feb. 2010.)
• "Do Zoos and Aquariums Promote Attitude Change in Visitors? A Critical Evaluation of the American Zoo and Aquarium Study," Marino, Lori; Lilienfeld, Scott O.; Malamud, Randy; Nobis, Nathan; Broglio, Ron; Society and Animals, Volume 18, Number 2, 2010, pp. 126-138(13)
• "Reasonable Humans and Animals: An Argument for Vegetarianism," Between the Species, Fall 2008; (3 page version, ideal for classroom use!)
• "Rational Engagement, Emotional Response and the Prospects for Progress in Animal Use 'Debates'" (in WORD) for Jeremy Garrett, ed., Animal Research in Theory and Practice (MIT Basic Bioethics Series, 2010). [Shorter final version ]. Here's a draft of an APPENDIX that addresses more arguments
• • (Another paper in this volume: Robert Bass, "Lives in the Balance: Utilitarianism and Animal Research")
• "Animals & Medicine: Do Animal Experiments Predict Human Responses?" Niall Shanks, Ray Greek, Nathan Nobis, and Jean Swingle-Greek, Skeptic: The Magazine , Volume 13, No. 3, Fall 2007, 44-51.
• A Reply, and a Reply to the Reply. 
• "The 'Babe' Vegetarians: Bioethics, Animal Minds and Moral Methodology," for Bioethics at the Movies, ed. Sandra Shapshay (Johns Hopkins Press, 2009).
  
• "A Rational Defense of Animal Experimentation," in Ethics and the Life Sciences , ed. Frederick Adams (Philosophy Documentation Center, 2006?). [Powerpoint]
• "Ayer and Stevenson's Epistemological Emotivism,"Croatian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. IV, No. 10, April, 2004, pp. 61-81. [HTML]
• "Feminist Ethics without Feminist Ethical Theory (or, more generally, phi-ethics without phi-ethical theory)" in Ethical Issues for the 21st Century, ed. Frederick Adams, special issue of the Journal of Philosophical Research, 2005, pp. 213-225. [PDF]
• "Carl Cohen's 'Kind' Argument For Animal Rights and Against Human Rights"Journal of Applied Philosophy, March 2004, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 43-59. [PDF]).
• Reprinted in Clare Palmer, ed., Animal Rights (Ashgate 2008).
• Neil Levy, "Cohen and Kinds: A Response to Nathan Nobis," Journal of Applied Philosophy, August 2004, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 213-217.
• "The Real Problem of Infant and Animal Suffering", Philo, a journal of the philosophy of religion Vol. 5, No. 2, Fall-Winter 2002, pp. 216-225.[PDF]
• "Vegetarianism and Virtue: Does Consequentialism Demand Too Little?"Social Theory and Practice : An International and Interdisciplinary Journal of Social Philosophy , vol. 28, no. 1, January 2002, pp. 135-56.
• An edited and improved version version of this paper is reprinted in the second edition of 2nd edition of Moral Issues In Global Perspective (Broadview Press, ed. Christine Koggel).
• "What would be so bad about rejecting libertarian 'free will'?" De Philosophia, Vol. XVI, No. 2, 21-34, 2002.
• "Vagueness, Borderline Cases, and Moral Realism: Where's the Incompatibility?"Philosophical Writings, No. 14, Summer 2000, pp. 29-39.
• "Cultivating Philosophical Skills and Virtues in Philosophy of Education" (Midwest Philosophy of Education Society, Fall 1999, Proceedings). [PDF].

Commentaries & letters:

• "Cut the Fat! Defending Trans Fats Bans" by Nathan Nobis, Molly Gardner; 2010. The American Journal of Bioethics. 10(3):39
  
• "Interests and Harms in Primate Research," The American Journal of Bioethics 2009; 9(5):27-29. A reply to "Bioethical Considerations in Translational Research: Primate Stroke,"by Michael E. Sughrue, E. Sander Connolly Jr., Andrew F. Ducruet, Ruth L. Fischbach, Ricardo J. Komotar, William J. Mack, Thomas E. Martin, J. Mocco, 2009. The American Journal of Bioethics 9(5):3
• Discussion with the "On the Human" project of the National Humanities Center. 
  
• An invited letter to the editor for Food Ethics magazine.
• "In Defense of 'How We Treat Our Relatives",' a letter to the editor in the the American Biology Teacher [PDF] November-December 2004. 
• "Who Needs the 'Actual Future Principle'? Harman on Abortion,"Southwest Philosophy Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, July, 2002, pp. 55-63. [PDF]
• "Animal Dissection and Evidence-Based Life-Science & Health-Professions Education: A Response to Jonathan Balcombe's Commentators,"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 5(2), 2002, pp. 155-159.
• '"Balancing Off" Infant Torture and Death: A Reply to Andrew Chignell," Religious Studies: An International Journal of Philosophy of Religion, Vol. 37, March (2001), pp. 103-108.

Reviews:

• Russ Shafer-Landau's Moral Realism: A Defence (Teaching Philosophy, 29:2, June 2006, pp. 178-181) [PDF]
• Review (with David Graham) of Putting Humans First: Why We Are Nature's Favorite by Tibor Machan, (The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, Fall 2006, Vol. 8, No. 1, 85-104). [ PDF of final version]
• Reply to John Altick's reply to our review Putting Humans First by Tibor Machan, The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies (with David Graham, Spring 2007). [PDF]
• Review of Why Animal Experimentation Matters: The Use of Animals in Medical Research,American Journal of Bioethics, Winter 2003, Vol. 3, No. 1, online Bioethics Education Network [PDF].
• A review of The Animal Rights Debate by Carl Cohen and Tom Regan (The Journal of Value Inquiry), 2002, vol. 36, Issue 4, pp. 579-583.

Other writings:

•  An encyclopedia article on Peter Singer for an Encyclopedia of Environmental Ethics and Philosophy. The final copy is here, scanned in from the encyclopedia. 
• An entry on "Animal Testing" written with Ray Greek, MD, and Kristina A. Hancock, JD, for anEncyclopedia of Issues in U.S. Public Policy. The volume was unfortunately canceled for publication. Perhaps someone else can use this entry?
• A talk at a "Science Tavern" meetup:
• An attempt at a meta-ethics paper for a 'popular' audience: "Moral Nihilism, Intellectual Nihilism & Practical Ethics"
• "Not 'Pro-Choice' and not 'Pro-Life': On the Ethics of Abortion", a Powerpoint presentation.
• News coverage: "Abortion lecture urges students to think logically," Mandy Morgan, UT Echo, Friday, February 27, 2004
• 'Abortion Discussion Held', quotes from a forum on abortion, UR Campus Times newspaper
• Taking Hunger seriously: Are YOU obligated to help desparately poor children?, a Powerpoint presentation.
• "WWJDWJWD? Comments on Linda Zagzebski's 'The Incarnation and Virtue Ethics'."

---

Courses and teaching / advising materials:

• Why take philosophy courses? Some information about philosophy as a major and as career preparation, for Morehouse students
• A guide to recommended introductory reading in philosophy

• Philosophy of Sex and Gender (Spring 2012)
  
• PHI302: Introduction to Philosophical Ethics (every semester)
• Some materials I use in this course.
• PHI410: Philosophy of Religion (Spring 2010, Spring 2007, Fall 2008)
• Summer 2009 IMHOTEP Bioethics mini-course 
• About the IMHOTEP program
• Introduction to Philosophy (Spring 2009)
• Advanced Ethics (Spring 2009) 
• Ethics & Animals, an online course for HSUS.  
• Bioethics (Fall 2009, Spring 2008)
• Metaphysics (Fall 2007)
• Theories of Good & Evil
• Honors Program Bioethics / Ethics & Animals seminar

---

Links: