Tips on How to be an Effective Manager
§ Decoding the soft management skills into
hard business results.
§ Challenging mind viruses such as fads, myths and assumptions that hamper managerial effectiveness.
The book is: $9.99
http://www.managersdontreadthis.com
Here's a chapter from the book:
STRENGTHS VS. WEAKNESSES
One area in organizations I have noticed over the years is their inability to adequately utilize their employee's strengths. Yet most managers during the recruitment and hiring process spend considerable time and effort exploring the potential employee's strengths.
It would be more appropriate for an organization, after hiring the employee, to focus on their strengths rather than spend tons and tons of money on training to turn an employee's weaknesses into strengths. This very seldom happens and has always puzzled me about organizations. Maybe it's a cultural disposition to identify our weaknesses. True, some training may be needed in some of the soft skills such as listening and interpersonal communications for some employees. However, in terms of their employees, an organization will get what they focus on. If a lot of focus is on an employee's weaknesses rather than their strengths, it could have consequences on the bottom-line.
As far as I know, winning baseball teams only draft players for positions in which they excel. They certainly do not draft a star pitcher and put him on third base. Please.
Performance appraisals are good examples of good intentions gone sour. First, the manager tells the employee how great he is and then the focus changes to the area that the employee is weak in. What a waste of time and energy. Yet, this kind of scenario is happening everyday in some organizations.
I will say again, I think some training on some weaknesses may be appropriate for an organization as long as the focus remains on the strengths. Employees are turned on with what they do well. I assure you that their weaknesses are a turn-off, not a turn-on. Therefore, it seems to follow that it makes little sense for an organization to spend an inordinate amount of time trying to shore up an employee's weaknesses. I am sure most CEOs utilized their strengths in arriving at their position, not on their weaknesses.
Why should their employees be any different?
CEOs open your minds. Read the research on this.
Gallup's research (based on 1.5 million interviews) suggests that only 20 per cent of employees feel they regularly get a chance to use their greatest strengths
( http://www.gallup.com/poll/1894/Focus-Your-Strengths-Fix-Your-Weaknesses.aspx/)
For example, the authors of "Now, Discover Your Strengths", Marcus Buckingham and Donald Clifton, say "Most organizations are built on two flawed assumptions about people."
1. Each person can learn to be competent in almost anything. (This confuses weaknesses and limitations)
2. Each person's greatest room for growth is in his or her areas of greatest weakness.
I know this is a generalization, but I believe that effective managers would never make those assumptions about their people. The best managers surely believe that their people can only be their best by utilizing their strengths. They make sure their employees are doing what they do best.
Every time.
All the time.
------------End------------



