MVCC WEB DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

Welcome‎ > ‎

Minutes/Agendas

Agenda 10.27.08

posted Oct 27, 2008 11:44 AM by Babak Nahid

Mar Vista Community Council Web Development Committee
Babak Nahid, Chair

Monday, October 27, 2008, 6:30-9:30 PM
Windward School
Tom Hunter Board Room, Room 500
11350 Palms Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90066 (Map)

Agenda

1.Call to Order and Introductions

2.Public Comment and Announcements

3. Approval of Minutes

4. Reports
-Proposal Review & Finalist Selection Process
-Interview and presentation process

5. Review and Evaluation of Proposals
-Proposal Evaluation Form

6. Motion to Approve Finalists for 10/29 and 10/30 Interview/Presentation.

7. Possible Motion to cite finalists who fail to win the project to be listed (if they wish) on the Web Dev site as prospective service providers for other community organizations.

8. Discussion of next steps
-10/29 and 10/30 interview presentation meetings
-Deadline to select winner for approval by BOD (Mon. Nov. 3, 2008)
-Drafting and approval of agreement with winning service provider (Nov. 10?)
-MVCC responsibilities

 
9. Future Agenda Items
-Motion to approve winning proposal
-Possible motion to approve Agreement for BOD vote

10. Public Comment

11. Adjourn

Minutes 7.1.08

posted Jul 5, 2008 4:24 PM by Babak Nahid   [ updated Oct 18, 2008 12:34 AM ]

Mar Vista Community Council

Web Development Ad Hoc Committee

Tuesday, July 1, 2008, 7-9 pm

3343 Inglewood Blvd., LA CA 90066
Babak Nahid, Co-Chair

Draft Minutes

1. Meeting called to order by Babak Nahid at 7:05 pm. The following people were present, or arrived as the meeting progressed: Babak Nahid, Albert Olson, Bill Scheding, Chuck Ray, Martin Rubin, Christopher McKinnon, Keith Lambert, and Laura Bodensteiner.

2. Introductions were made, and Bill Scheding announced that he was present as a Mar Vista stakeholder, and not as a MVCC Boardmember.

3. The minutes from the previous (June 19) meeting were presented and approved, with one abstention.

4. Bill Scheding made a motion requesting that the RFP process be discontinued and that the current website instead be improved and updated. The motion was not seconded, and was dropped.

5. A review of the proposed Request For Proposal (RFP) ensued, with a paragraph by paragraph discussion of the document. A few changes were proposed and accepted, with the end result being a motion (by Albert Olson, and seconded by Martin Rubin) to approve the revised RFP contigent on certain issues being discussed with the City Attorney’s Office or DONE, and their satisfactory resolution. The motion passed with 6 votes in favor and 1 abstention.

Below is the final RFP. The issues to be resolved by the City Attorney’s Office or DONE are:

1. work-for-hire clause
2. Intellectual property

6. Meeting was adjourned at 8:30 pm.

‹ Prev    1-2 of 2    Next ›